Daniel Valdez

STAT10 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 19/100
RMP rating: 1.8/5
Take again: 16.67%
Difficulty: 3.7

The decision

unless you are highly independent and , and limited support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSlow gradingTough graderHeavy workloadPoor supportPolarized clarity

Most reviews are strongly negative, with , and warnings to avoid.
Online reviews are mixed only because one , while and poor flexibility.
In-person evidence is extremely negative, with students describing the class as one of .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Despite one A+ review, most reported grades are F and students describe tough grading, no , and poor support.

Online has one easy success story but several failures, while A.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

One student found the lectures clear, but , and difficulty succeeding.

Online evidence is split between very clear lectures and serious complaints, while experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

, but one review warns that skipping class hurts success and comments show little flexibility overall.

Online reviews mention participation and inflexibility, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students warn against taking him because of , and limited flexibility.

Online reviews are mixed but mostly risky, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Multiple students report F grades, tough grading, no , and unwillingness to help with grade recovery.

Format shift

Online reviews mention slow and , while and harsh outcomes.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Repeated tags cite lots of homework and papers, and students connect the workload with poor outcomes.

Format shift

Both formats include heavy workload signals, with .

Teaching experience

Awful

25/100

One review praises clear lectures, but most reviews , and .

Format shift

Online teaching is polarized, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention homework, papers, grading delays, participation, and , but not enough .

Format shift

Online reviews focus on grading delays and flexibility, while , and lack of .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are uniformly negative, describing harsh , and a strong warning to leave.

Main concern

Students report severe lack of , and a bad overall experience.

What students said

“ !”
STAT10

“No and very little explanation on the first three weeks of class.”
STAT10

“Run before you can.”
STAT10

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are inconsistent, with one strong praise for but several complaints about slow grades, little flexibility, and failure.

Main concern

and weak support can create serious risk for .

What students said

“Grades extremely slow. !”
STAT10

“Valdez was unwilling to be flexible, when students were trying to ask for help or .”
STAT10

“Mr. ”
STAT10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, webcam use, .

No Extra CreditAssessment Details Unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove exam format, closed-book rules, or strict proctoring.

No Extra Credit

“No and very little explanation on the first three weeks of class.”
STAT10

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, .

Assessment Details Unclear

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“This was one of the life.”
Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“ .”

👎 Recommendation Risk

18/100

“ !”

⚖️

15/100

“No and very little explanation on the first three weeks of class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

Grades extremely slow.
No
Unfortunately, failure bit me.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

!
Run before you can.
If you need grades ASAP for your !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews provide a consistent negative pattern, though one very positive online review creates some uncertainty.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51

4 out of 50

3 out of 50

2 out of 51

1 out of 54

Course coverage

STAT106 reviews

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 1

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

F 4

No letter grade reported

Not sure yet 1

Daniel Valdez

x x unless you are highly independent and x x x x x x x, and limited support.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

MissionImpossible

Challenging

Mandatory

Avoid

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

👎 Recommendation Risk

⚖️ x x

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

⚠️ About Student Experience

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

F results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

unless you are highly independent and , and limited support.

⚖️