AI Rate Professor

Guidance

Myra Andrade

GUID2 · GUID2095 · GUID20955 · GUIDE2 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
80/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
69.23%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want a and can tolerate delayed grade updates.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringEasy ASlow GradingReading HeavyExtra Credit
  • Students often describe Andrade as caring, approachable, and supportive.
  • The class is usually an easy A if students keep up with reading and assignments.
  • The main repeated and occasional online organization issues.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

An A is very attainable with completed reading and , though the workload is not always minimal.

Online reviews call it an easy A more often, while as doable but tied to participation.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The course content is guidance-focused and usually easy, but and .

Online reviews emphasize textbook reading, while class.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance is not always described as strict, but and .

In-person evidence mentions participation and , while online reviews focus more on deadlines and reading.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and helpful, but slow grading creates real hesitation.

, while online reviews include several strong warnings about grading delays.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Grades appear forgiving because students mention easy A outcomes, , and .

Format shift

Online and , but online reviews complain more about delayed grading.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Work is usually manageable but often reading-heavy, with .

Format shift

Online reviews report more reading and homework pressure, while .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

She is widely seen as caring and approachable, but online organization and .

Format shift

, while because of slow grading and unclear directions in some reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews , and assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats point to assignment-based grading, with in-person reviews adding participation credit.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are more consistently positive, emphasizing care, participation, comfort, and manageable work.

Main concern

Participation and .

What students said

“Shes awesome”
GUID2
“most of the work was done in class and your participation and as credit.”
GUID2
“The class is definitely doable not hard at all just don't expect to ”
GUID2

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are split between strong praise for support and repeated frustration with and organization.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Easy A. and helps you out if you need it.”
GUID2
“She gives A LOT of work where it can be overwhelming at times.”
GUID2
“Again, this class is an easy A, but the professor made it tedious”
GUID2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a specific exam format, .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policyAssignment-Based Course

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, midterms, finals, or other exam rules.

Reviews do not clearly prove in-person exam policy

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Reviews do not clearly prove online exam policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I took Professor Andrade's online class and it's definitely an easy A, but and she constantly changes the due dates of assignments, which made the class difficult to keep up with and keep an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Professor Andrade is extremely caring an super easy to talk to. All you have to do is reach out and give effort.”

📈 Easy A Potential

84/100

“As long as you follow the instructions in her syllabus, an A is easily attainable.”

⚠️

45/100

“She is not responsible with .”

Theme 1

❤️ About Support

  • and helps you out if you need it.
  • Great teacher. .
  • You can tell she really cares about her students.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Assignment instructions are easy to understand, but note their .
  • She gives A LOT of work where it can be overwhelming at times.
  • Professor Andrade provides a good amount of work but it's not overwhelming.

Theme 3

⏳

  • Takes forever to .
  • She takes FOREVER to update grades which makes it hard to keep track of your progress.
  • Don't expect to get your homework grades back fast she takes forever to grade the homework.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 26 reviews span several years and show consistent themes across formats.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

GUID221 reviews
GUIDE23 reviews
GUID20951 review
GUID209551 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 8 · A 4

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Not sure yet 7