AI Rate Professor

Guidance

Brett Bladh

GUID3 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

Bladh looks like an excellent choice for students who want a supportive and easy online guidance class.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyVery helpfulCaring teacherEasy courseClear gradingHighly recommended
  • Both reviews describe Bladh as extremely helpful, caring, and supportive.
  • The class appears very easy, with A-range outcomes and low difficulty ratings.
  • Evidence is very positive but limited because only .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

94/100

Both students earned A-range grades and .

All evidence comes from online reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

92/100

The class appears low-difficulty and support-heavy, with no comments describing challenging content.

Only online evidence exists, so course easiness cannot be compared across formats.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

65/100

Reviews , so flexibility cannot be proven beyond the online format.

, and there are no in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

100/100

because , and focused on student success.

Recommendation evidence comes only from online reviews and is unanimously positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

A-range grades and comments about help with .

Format shift

, and there is no in-person comparison.

Workload

Featherlight

92/100

Difficulty ratings are very low and reviews do not mention heavy workload.

Format shift

Only online workload evidence is available.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students describe him as friendly, caring, helpful, and the .

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely online and consistently excellent.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The only clear assessment evidence mentions help with assignments, with no exam-focused comments.

Format shift

Online reviews mention assignments, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews are unanimously positive, praising his support, friendliness, and help with assignments.

Main concern

The only concern is limited evidence from just two reviews.

What students said

“He is so friendly and really wants to help you succeed.”
guid3
“ and he showed that he truly cared about getting all his students to pass.”
guid3

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring policy, open-book rule, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Mr. Bladh the and he is very sweet.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and support. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“Mr. Bladh the and he is very sweet.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

100/100

“ !”

❤️ Student Support

98/100

“he showed that he truly cared about getting all his students to pass.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is so friendly and really wants to help you succeed.
  • Overall great teacher. 10/10

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • he showed that he truly cared about getting all his students to pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

, so the tone is very positive but the evidence base is small.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

guid32 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values