AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Ivan Leon

ACCTGFS3017088 · ACCTGFS30 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
11/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

unless you can teach yourself, manage strict deadlines, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProLots Of HomeworkStrict SyllabusUnhelpful LecturesExpensive MaterialsHigh Penalty Risk
  • Students report , and high course costs.
  • Several comments describe lectures as insufficient, unfocused, or longer than useful.
  • Strict syllabus enforcement and zeroes for missed work create high grade risk.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

25/100

Getting an A looks difficult because missed work can become a , and students report low grades despite effort.

Online reviews show the strongest grade risk, while the class work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

One review says the class is not conceptually hard, but poor guidance and fast-track coverage make the experience difficult.

Online evidence is mixed on content difficulty, while harder.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

The syllabus appears rigid because one student says missing anything for an emergency results in a zero.

Online evidence shows strict missed-work penalties, while in-person evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

because the course is expensive, homework-heavy, strict, and not very helpful.

Online reviews are mostly negative with one partial positive, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

because missed work can receive a zero and reported grades include multiple D-range outcomes.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the clearest harsh-grading evidence, while .

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and hours spent figuring out assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews strongly show heavy workload, and the as harder than class work.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Students describe limited help, tangents, insufficient equation instruction, and lectures that do not prepare them well for homework.

Format shift

Both formats criticize instruction, though one online review notes he answers emails.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

The , and finals, so assessment is mixed rather than purely exam-based.

Format shift

Online reviews mention homework, a group paper, and two finals, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The distract from class, and homework covers material not taught.

Main concern

and not clearly taught beforehand.

What students said

“He typically goes on tangents about random subjects”
ACCTGFS30
“ in class.”
ACCTGFS30

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe costly materials, heavy workload, strict missed-work penalties, and uneven instructional support.

Main concern

Students while keeping up with strict rules.

What students said

“His classes cost a lot of money, and require going outside of .”
ACCTGFS30
“If you have an emergency and miss ANYTHING, you will get a 0.”
ACCTGFS3017088
“I spent hours trying to figure it out”
ACCTGFS30

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention finals but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book policies.

Two FinalsFinal Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The be on the final but does not clearly prove the final format or proctoring policy.

Final Mentioned
“it will not be on the final.”
ACCTGFS30

Online

Online reviews mention two finals but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Two Finals
“only focused on his in .”
ACCTGFS30

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you have an emergency and miss ANYTHING, you will get a 0.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting workload, strict policies, teaching gaps, and assessment risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Strict Policies

10/100

“If you have an emergency and miss ANYTHING, you will get a 0.”

📚 Heavy Workload

18/100

“I took the fast track and there is a lot to cover each week.”

👨‍🏫 Teaching Concerns

25/100

“ in class.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • His classes cost a lot of money, and require going outside of .
  • I took the fast track and there is a lot to cover each week.
  • I spent hours trying to figure it out

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He typically goes on tangents about random subjects
  • Lectures are longer then necessary and .
  • Professor didn't focus enough on how to solve equations for homework

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Four detailed reviews across recent years show consistent concerns, but the sample size is small and .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACCTGFS303 reviews
ACCTGFS30170881 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values