AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jeffrey Brouwer

MATH32 · MATH25 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if and support, but be cautious about online sections.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear in person teachingCaring and funnyFast online paceHomework heavy onlineTest heavy
  • In person .
  • The single online review reports , and weak support.
  • Grades look achievable, but the effort and experience depend heavily on format.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Students earned decent grades, but , and homework rather than an effortless A.

In person evidence suggests fair effort, while the online review says the workload and pace are much harder.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The material is manageable with his in , but online pacing and .

In , while the online review describes a fast and difficult experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

One in person tag says participation matters, but the reviews do not clearly prove a .

Attendance evidence comes mainly from in person tags, with .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

, but the online review is a clear warning against that format.

In person reviews are highly positive, while the only online .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Grades are passing but there is and .

Format shift

The .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload seems normal in person but heavy online because of .

Format shift

, while in person reviews do not emphasize workload.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

In person , and care, but the online review reports poor pacing.

Format shift

Teaching is praised in person and criticized online.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tags mention tests and assignments.

Format shift

In person tags mention test-heavy work, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person reviews describe him as , and .

Main concern

Tests and .

What students said

“ so simple.”
MATH-25
“He will help you learn the material.”
MATH-25

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review is negative, , and an expectation that students already know the material.

Main concern

The course may move too fast online with .

What students said

“ .”
MATH32
“Moves way .”
MATH32

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests but do not clearly prove the .

Test HeavyExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews mention test-heavy expectations but .

Test Heavy

Online

The online review does not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very good math professor. so simple. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting format differences in teaching, workload, and recommendation. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“ so simple.”

👍 Recommendation Split

68/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Risk

45/100

“Moves way .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's good.
  • His lectures are detailed and .
  • He teaches hands on interaction.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Get ready to read
  • Test heavy
  • Moves way .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • .
  • He doesn't mind you bugging him.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

, and the online view is based on a single older comment.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH-252 reviews
MATH321 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1