AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Edward Kim

STAT10 · MATH425 · MATH25 · MATH60 · MATH410 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
77.78%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you can attend consistently and study from his notes, but be cautious about online sections.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear lecturesExam-aligned notesAttendance mattersTest heavyMath made understandable
  • Most and exam-aligned examples.
  • Getting an A is realistic when students attend, follow notes, and .
  • The single online review is negative and reports poor communication and hard-to-follow recorded lectures.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

An A is very reachable because exams closely match notes and examples, but , and study.

an A, while the single online review describes a much harder learning experience.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The math content itself is not easy, but his structured lectures make it manageable for students who follow along.

, while the online review says the material became hard to learn from recordings.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

as formally mandatory, but students repeatedly say missing class will hurt because lectures drive exams.

In-person reviews emphasize showing up for notes and examples, while the online review does not provide a .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

83/100

Most students recommend him because , and effort is rewarded.

, but the only online review is a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Grading feels student-friendly because tests mirror examples and some sections allow notes or .

Format shift

In-person evidence supports lenient and predictable grading, while the online review .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Students mention homework and test preparation, but the workload is usually framed as reasonable for math if you keep up.

Format shift

and lecture notes, while the online review calls the .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Most students describe him as , and effective at making math understandable.

Format shift

In-person teaching is rated very strongly, while the and poor email response.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews emphasize tests, study guides, examples, and notes, with .

Format shift

Both formats mention tests, but while the online student struggled with lecture delivery.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly positive, with , and predictable tests.

Main concern

because lectures move quickly and exams follow class examples.

What students said

“He is easy to understand and he goes through sample problems with you one step at a time!”
STAT10
“ .”
MATH410
“Expect some fast lectures, but as long as you follow along, ask questions, you'll do fine.”
MATH425

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is negative and says communication and recorded lectures were poor.

Main concern

Online support may be weak based on the .

What students said

“Professor .”
STAT10
“Lectures were just of .”
STAT10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally student-friendly because they closely follow notes, study guides, and example problems, with some sections allowing notes.

Tests Match NotesStudy Guide HelpfulNotes Allowed In Some Sections

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as easy or closely matched to notes, with one review explicitly saying notes or notebooks were allowed sometimes.

Tests Match NotesStudy Guide HelpfulNotes Allowed In Some Sections
“the .”
MATH425
“He also let us use a page of and sometimes our whole notebook.”
MATH25
“ .”
MATH410

Online

The online review says the course was test heavy but does not clearly prove proctoring, .

Test HeavyPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“Lectures were just of .”
STAT10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“He taught the material in a way that you could understand.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

83/100

“ .”

📝

82/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and the .
  • He is easy to understand and he goes through sample problems with you one step at a time!
  • Professor Kim is great teacher. He gives great techniques to solving problems.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Calculus is not an easy subject, but I was able to ace the class because of his teaching style.
  • If you want an easy A, then this is the class you need.
  • Expect some fast lectures, but as long as you follow along, ask questions, you'll do fine.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Online Risk

  • Professor .
  • Hard to understand.
  • Im not the , but I tried and it was hard to learn anything just watching someone.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

The review set is modest at 11 reviews, but and consistent, with only one online review.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

STAT105 reviews
MATH4253 reviews
MATH251 review
MATH4101 review
MATH601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 6 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values