AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Samuel Hughes

PHIL70 · PHIL76 · PHIL101 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
97/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want a low-stress philosophy course with and a very realistic A.

Best fit · Easy A HunterClear expectationsEasy quizzesLight workloadReading basedLow-pressure professor
  • Students consistently report A grades with , and a few papers.
  • and low-pressure, though some students describe them as teach-yourself.
  • All reviewers would take him again, making him a strong choice for students who can work independently.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

94/100

A grades look very easy to earn because quizzes and assignments are straightforward if students do the reading and basic work.

Online reviews strongly support an easy A through quizzes and light writing, while .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

The and thought-provoking but consistently described as , and not heavy.

Online sections are easy but self-directed, while not much workload.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

Reviews do not prove strict attendance, though participation, readings, quizzes, and .

Online evidence centers on asynchronous reading, quizzes, and discussion posts, while strict attendance rule.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

because the , and low-stress.

Both formats are positive, with stronger online evidence and limited but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

because all reported grades are A or A+ and students describe quizzes and assignments as easy.

Format shift

Online reviews give the clearest evidence of , while but sparse.

Workload

Light

85/100

Workload is , and a few spaced papers.

Format shift

Online reviews describe regular but and writing, while lot of course load.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Students describe him as , and able to spark interest, though some want a more active presence.

Format shift

Online reviews praise clarity and feedback but note self-teaching, while but less detailed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment , and papers rather than exams.

Format shift

Online evidence clearly points to quizzes, discussions, readings, and papers, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

but positive, describing interesting material and a low workload.

Main concern

The class may not feel highly engaging for every student.

What students said

“Not a lot of course load, but also not the most engaging class.”
PHIL70
“he is a chill teacher, if you just do your job you will get by with no problem.”
PHIL101

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews describe a , and limited professor intrusion.

Main concern

Students who want active lectures or frequent instructor presence may find the class too self-directed.

What students said

“ but very easy if you did the readings.”
PHIL70
“This class was more teach yourself, reading material was provided and and .”
Phil76
“ .”
PHIL70

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The course appears assessment-light with reading quizzes and a few essays, but reviews do not .

Chapter QuizzesReading BasedFew EssaysPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, open-book policy, midterm, or .

Online

Online reviews mention chapter quizzes, discussions, readings, and papers, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Chapter QuizzesReading BasedFew EssaysPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“ but very easy if you did the readings.”
PHIL70
“ and .”
Phil76
“ and they were spaced out nicely!”
PHIL70

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Easy A Path

94/100

“ but very easy if you did the readings.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Balance

85/100

“ and they were spaced out nicely!”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • but very easy if you did the readings.
  • he is a chill teacher, if you just do your job you will get by with no problem.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing professor, very straight forward and has answers for your emails within 24 hours
  • This class was more teach yourself, reading material was provided and and .
  • and advises accordingly.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Not a lot of course load, but also not the most engaging class.
  • and they were spaced out nicely!
  • and discussion assignments for the students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Only 7 reviews are available, but they are recent enough, highly consistent, and include both online and in-person perspectives.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL705 reviews
PHIL1011 review
Phil761 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 3 · A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values