AI Rate Professor

English

Emilie Koenig

ENGL1B · ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENG1B14230 · ENG1C16265 · ENG1B · ENGL16099 · ENGL1A20109 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
85%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a and can stay on top of frequent writing assignments.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtremely caringVery lenient gradingLots of writingExtra creditClear support
  • Students describe her as exceptionally caring, understanding, and helpful.
  • Grades are very achievable because of late work, revisions, , and .
  • The main tradeoff is a high volume of writing, papers, posts, and assignments.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

93/100

An A is highly reachable because she accepts late work, offers revisions and , and grades completion and effort generously.

conditions, while online reviews confirm leniency but warn against procrastination.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The writing itself is not conceptually hard for most students because , and feedback.

, though online students mention more writing volume.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

72/100

She is flexible with late work and support, but as .

, while in-person reviews focus more on late work and redo flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and makes English feel manageable.

Both online and adding more workload cautions.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

94/100

Students repeatedly mention easy grading, late work, revisions, , wiggle room, and credit for completed effort.

Format shift

Leniency appears in both formats, with especially direct easy A evidence in in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

46/100

The class is forgiving but writing-heavy, with , and weekly work in several reviews.

Format shift

Online reviews and writing, while in-person reviews still mention significant work.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students consistently describe her as , and unusually effective at making English approachable.

Format shift

Teaching praise is strong and consistent across online and in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

24/100

Assessment appears centered on essays, drafts, discussion posts, revisions, setup work, and assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize writing assignments and process work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews describe a very easy-to-pass, supportive class with lenient grading, late work, redos, and , but .

Main concern

The work volume is .

What students said

“Literally easy A.”
ENG1A
“You can turn in , and ask for help.”
ENG1A
“She was not a , but she assigned a significant amount of work each week.”
ENGL1B

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students praise her kindness, clear expectations, feedback, flexibility, and , while repeatedly noting heavy writing and assignments.

Main concern

The online workload can pile up if students procrastinate.

What students said

“DO NOT PROCRASTINATE.”
ENGL1A
“Consistent EC and .”
ENG1A
“ ”
ENG1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an , but one online review explicitly .

No QuizzesNo clear proctoring policy

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and redos, but do not clearly prove any exam, quiz, midterm, final, open-book, or closed-book policy.

Online

, and no quizzes, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

No Quizzes
“ ”
ENG1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You can turn in , and ask for help.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“She is such an amazing teacher and makes english so easy understandable and fun”

⚖️

94/100

“You get graded for completing assignments and she takes late work.”

✍️ Workload Reality

46/100

“Be prepared to write quite a bit though!”

Theme 1

❤️ About Support and Care

  • She really cares for her students & wants them to succeed.
  • as health issues.
  • Love Professor K, always helpful and !

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Flexibility

  • Literally easy A.
  • Consistent EC and .
  • and gave a lot of to redo the essays towards the end of the semester.

Theme 3

✍️ About Writing Load

  • There is a lot of writing needed for this class but other than that as long as .
  • She does give a good amount of work every module, but and will help you no matter what.
  • You have to write quite a few papers but theyre interesting & she grades fair.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty reviews across both formats provide detailed, consistent evidence of , and writing-heavy workload.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1A9 reviews
ENG1B3 reviews
ENGL1A3 reviews
ENG1B142301 review
ENG1C162651 review
Show 3 more courses
ENGL160991 review
ENGL1A201091 review
ENGL1B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 8 · A 1 · A- 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values