AI Rate Professor

Art

Leta Ming

ART19 · ARTHST2 · ARTH1 · ARTH5 · ARTH310248 · ARTH30430104 · ARTH323085 · ARTH19 · ARTH3 · ARTHISTORY1 · 49 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you like art history and , and inconsistent organization.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLecture heavyCaring but disorganizedHeavy readingParticipation pressureTough grading
  • Students often , and knowledge of art history.
  • Many reviews complain about long, fast, and .
  • Grades range widely because some students find her easy while , and overwhelming workload.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

Some students call the class an easy A, but many others , and careful attention.

Online reviews lean harder because of and tough quizzes, while but remain inconsistent.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course content is not always conceptually impossible, but fast lectures, dense art history material, and memorization make it challenging.

Online students report more overwhelm from lectures and assignments, while if they pay attention.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

36/100

Participation and being present matter often, and some reviews describe being called on or penalized for disengagement.

Online reviews mention discussions and participation, while and attendance value.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Students are split because her care and passion help some students while disorganization, workload, and .

Online recommendations are more negative overall, while but include more strong supporters.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

44/100

or and many others calling her tough or unfair.

Format shift

Online reviews more often describe tough grading, while hard.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Many reviews mention lots of reading, papers, lectures, discussions, research, and .

Format shift

Online workload is frequently described as heavy and time-consuming, while but more often manageable.

Teaching experience

Average

56/100

She is caring and knowledgeable, but , and unorganized lectures limit the teaching score.

Format shift

Online teaching , while in-person comments mix strong passion with fast and .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessments include quizzes, exams, papers, discussions, research work, presentations, and participation.

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussions, quizzes, exams, essays, and research papers, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, but more students describe her as , and helpful while still noting fast lectures and participation pressure.

Main concern

and forced participation frustrate some students.

What students said

“No matter how hard i tried i NEVER got a good grade”
ARTH3
“The workload is expected, but not difficult.”
ARTH19
“ .”
ARTH1
“ .”
ARTH5

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are polarized, with some praising her care and feedback but many warning , and .

Main concern

Online workload and lecture volume can feel overwhelming and confusing.

What students said

“ !!!”
ART19
“Her course is simple it has discussions, easy exams, writing assignments that require critical thinking.”
ART19
“ .”
ARTH3
“ ”
ARTH19

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam friendliness varies because comments mention open-book quizzes and , and finals.

Open Book Quiz MentionedHard Tests MentionedMidtermFinalResearch PaperPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

47/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and hard tests, but do not clearly prove open-book rules or proctoring policies.

QuizzesMidtermFinalFair Exams MentionedHard Tests Mentioned
“ .”
ARTHST2
“definitely study for the , and final.”
ARTH1
“ .”
ARTH5

Online

Online reviews mention easy exams in one class and open-book quizzes in another, but and do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, or Lockdown Browser.

Open Book Quiz MentionedEasy Exams MentionedHard Tests MentionedMidtermFinalResearch Paper
“easy exams”
ART19
“ ”
ARTH19
“A couple of , and .”
ARTH3
“lectures are long and unless you have free time.”
ARTH1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ though and wants everyone to pass so if you run into a problem just let her know.”

Voice snapshots generated from 49 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

56/100

“She is very knowledgeable instructor with a passion for art history and teaching.”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“ .”

⚖️

44/100

“No matter how hard I tried I kept getting low grades in this class.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She communicates with her students very well and give lots of .
  • Her lectures are incredibly boring.
  • This professor was very problematic. Her lectures are difficult to understand for and unorganized.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • There is a lot of and the textbook.
  • Write tons of & a research paper.
  • Course is inundated with information

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Honestly pretty easy, just skimmed through the PowerPoints and got an A.
  • .
  • Not professor quality, always seems to be in a

Theme 4

❤️ About Character

  • She cares and wants you to succeed.
  • Very approachable and always very eagerly to answer any question.
  • Professor Ming is a great professor, she really cares a lot about her students and wants everybody to pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

49

Recent reviews read by the AI

49

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-nine reviews across many years and both formats provide rich, repeated evidence despite polarized opinions.

Inside 49 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 58
3 out of 58
2 out of 57
1 out of 58

Course coverage

ARTH115 reviews
ARTH312 reviews
ART196 reviews
ARTH196 reviews
ARTH53 reviews
Show 6 more courses
ARTHISTORY12 reviews
934921 review
ARTH304301041 review
ARTH3102481 review
ARTH3230851 review
ARTHST21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

40 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 5 · A 13 · A- 2

B range

10

B+ 5 · B 3 · B- 2

C range

4

C 3 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3