AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Ronda Shutt

ACCOUNTING30 · ACCTG1A · ACCT1B · ACCT1A · ACCTG1B · ACCT2 · ACCTG435 · ACCTG7248 · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
87.5%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a supportive accounting professor and are willing to keep up with .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and helpfulClear accounting explanationsHeavy homeworkExtra creditHighly recommended
  • Students overwhelmingly praise her care, accessibility, and .
  • Accounting remains work-heavy, but many students say the effort leads to strong grades.
  • , and support make the course feel fair despite the workload.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

An A is very achievable with steady work because students report , and many A outcomes, but not effortless.

Online students describe doable work with support but heavy pacing, while in-person students more often mention and dropped scores.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Accounting concepts are not easy, but and support make the material manageable for prepared students.

Online reviews report more workload pressure, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

65/100

but reviews do not show a consistently strict mandatory policy.

Online Zoom sessions are described as , while in-person students are encouraged to attend to succeed.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and fair despite the workload.

Both formats are highly positive, though online reviews include more complaints about workload and deadline pressure.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Grading appears generous because students mention , and many A grades.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide the clearest evidence of extra credit and dropped scores, while online reviews also mention and .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The workload is heavy, with , and projects mentioned across reviews.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize workload more sharply, while as normal for accounting.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students consistently describe her as , and effective at making accounting understandable.

Format shift

Both formats praise her teaching, but online students rely more on lecture videos and Zoom support.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment combines homework, quizzes, projects, discussions, exams, a final, and rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

Online reviews give the clearest mix of assignments and exams, while , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly positive, describing a passionate, helpful teacher who makes a hard subject clearer and often offers .

Main concern

Students still need to work hard because and .

What students said

“As with almost any accounting class you .”
ACCTG435
“ .”
ACCTG1A
“Just like any other Accounting class, you have to work hard.”
ACCT1B

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students usually praise her lectures and support, but several warn that workload and deadline structure can be demanding.

Main concern

The main online concern is falling behind because of and fixed due dates.

What students said

“Her lecture videos were wonderful. She made them as understandable as possible!”
ACCT1A
“Very easy to fall behind. Coursework requires studying and lots of math.”
ACCT1A
“There are 3 exams, a final and .”
ACCTG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because reviews mention study guides, , dropped scores, and one report of cheat sheets, though not every course policy is specified.

Study guidesExtra credit on examsDropped low scoresCheat sheets mentionedMidterm and final

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

scores, cheat sheets, weekly quizzes, midterms, and finals, but do not clearly prove proctoring rules.

Study guidesExtra credit on examsDropped low scoresCheat sheets mentionedWeekly quizzesMidterm and final
“ .”
ACCTG1A
“She does give a study guide for .”
ACCT1A
“allows you to bring in cheat sheets for the test.”
ACCT1A

Online

Online reviews mention three exams and a final but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or .

Three examsFinal examExam policy unclear
“There are 3 exams, a final and .”
ACCTG1A
“I took Rhonda Shutt because of her good reviews. 3-7 hours of .”
ACCT1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Shutt is amazing. She makes it sooo easy to get an A in this class. Its a lot of work but not too difficult.”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“She does a great job clearly explaining things and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“ ”

⚖️

88/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lecture videos were wonderful. She made them as understandable as possible!
  • Ronda made a difficult subject easy and interesting to learn.
  • and always willing to help you understand material.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • This class is beyond difficult, so much,pre homework, homework, reading discussion boards, videos to watch
  • There is a ton of homework though, but she does tell you this up front.
  • You will have to work in this class and do a good job but she makes you want to learn and do well.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • A few opportunities that I wish I took advantage of, , and she sends reminders if you forget.
  • I thought I was going to pass with a B at the end but with all the that was given, I passed with a solid A.
  • Great teacher. . Helps you prepare for tests and gives ample amount of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-two reviews across many years and both formats show strong consistency about her support, workload, fairness, and teaching quality.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 530
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACCT1A13 reviews
ACCTG1A10 reviews
ACCTG4353 reviews
ACCT1B2 reviews
ACCOUNTING301 review
Show 3 more courses
ACCT21 review
ACCTG1B1 review
ACCTG72481 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 2 · A 7 · A- 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1