AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Linda Devillers

HUMANSEXUALITY · SOC12 · SCSCI17 · PSYCH25 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
69/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Devillers is a good pick for students who want a straightforward class, but .

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy CourseMixed CommunicationOnline FriendlySlow GradingRude Emails
  • Students often describe the course as easy, straightforward, and passable with basic reading and assignments.
  • Online reviews are mostly positive but include complaints about rude or .
  • In-person-labeled reviews are mixed and include older comments that actually reference online experiences.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

The class is repeatedly described as easy to pass with readings, PowerPoints, discussions, and basic work, though .

Online evidence clearly supports an easy grade path, while and more mixed.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

Students call the content straightforward, simple, easy to understand, and manageable with readings and slides.

Online evidence is strongest for easy content, while and criticism.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and much of the course evidence centers on online work.

Online reviews imply flexible asynchronous work, while in-person-counted reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Most positive reviews recommend her for an easy, informative class, but communication problems create real hesitation.

Online reviews are mostly favorable with one strong warning, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students describe the class as easy to pass and mention , though .

Format shift

, while in-person-counted comments include harsher communication complaints.

Workload

Moderate

63/100

Work includes , and papers, but students often call it straightforward.

Format shift

Online workload is structured but manageable, while .

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Students often praise clarity and learning value, but repeated complaints about rudeness and slow responses lower the experience.

Format shift

Online teaching is generally praised, while in-person-counted reviews contain stronger communication complaints.

Assessment method

Balanced

56/100

The course uses discussions, tests, a book report, an interview paper, readings, and lecture notes.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the clearest assessment details; and notes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and ease but also complaints about rude emails, weak help, and book pressure.

Main concern

The evidence is older and includes comments that .

What students said

“She's a little bit rude, but an excellent professor.”
PSYCH25
“ !!”
SCSCI17

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews mostly call the class easy and well organized, though one .

Main concern

Communication and if there is a dispute.

What students said

“Easy to understand, easy to pass.”
SCSCI17
“She was very rude in her emails when I asked for clarification”
SCSCI17

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and studying notes and the book, but do not clearly prove open-book status, webcam rules, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or closed-book rules.

Four TestsLecture NotesBook-Based Study

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and the book, but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring rules.

TestsLecture NotesBook-Based Study
“ and the book.”
PSYCH25

Online

Online reviews mention four tests but do not clearly prove open-book, webcam, proctoring, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Four Tests
“ and interview paper.”
SCSCI17

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy to understand, easy to pass. If you don't pass with at least a B, you were definitely lazy because the class is straightforward/simple as can be.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in easiness, communication, and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“Professor De Villers is a wonderful teacher.”

📈 Easy Grade Path

80/100

“I got an A+, and I didn't kill myself for it!”

⚠️ Communication Risk

45/100

“She was very rude in her emails when I asked for clarification”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great Professor!
  • Professor De Villers is a wonderful teacher.
  • She's a little bit rude, but an excellent professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy to understand, easy to pass.
  • the class is straightforward/simple as can be.
  • I got an A+, and I didn't kill myself for it!

Theme 3

📬 About Communication

  • She takes FOREVER to get back to you and appears to be rude through e-mails.
  • She was very rude in her emails when I asked for clarification
  • she always emailed me back if I had questions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews cover both formats, but several are old and .

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

SCSCI175 reviews
HUMANSEXUALITY1 review
PSYCH251 review
SOC121 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

3

B+ 2 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values