AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Rennard Piamonte

STAT10 · MATH510 · MATH425 · MATH65A · MATH25 · MATH420 · MATH65B · STATS10 · MATH6966 · MATH31 · MATH410 · 48 lifetime ratings

AI rating
67/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
51.85%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Consider him for in-person lower math if you can keep up, but be cautious with online or STAT10 sections.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear step-by-step lecturesMixed supportTest heavyExtra credit availableOnline risk
  • Older in-person math reviews often praise , and practice support.
  • Recent online STAT10 and MATH65A reviews are , and rude or limited help.
  • He can be a good fit for , and ask questions, but online sections look much riskier.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Good grades are realistic with , and practice, but students do not describe it as effortless.

and low support, while in-person reviews more often mention fair grading, , and study aids.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

He often makes math understandable step by step, but stats and online sections can still feel hard and time-consuming.

as clear, while online sections are described as hard and under-supported.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

38/100

Reviews do not clearly say attendance is mandatory, but many students , and questions to succeed.

In-person comments stress attending and participating, while online and outside help.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

63/100

Recommendation is split because many in-person students praise him, while recent online students strongly warn against him.

In-person recommendation is generally positive across older lower math reviews, while online recommendation is very low.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

67/100

Many in-person students mention fair or , and partial credit, but online students report tough grading.

Format shift

Online grading is described as harsh and test-heavy, while , and dropped low scores.

Workload

Moderate

43/100

and sometimes heavy, especially in statistics and online sections, but many students see it as useful practice.

Format shift

Online workload is heavy and time-consuming, while if students keep pace.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

as clear and step-by-step, but online and STAT10 reviews report poor support and rude responses.

Format shift

, while online teaching evidence is strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews repeatedly mention , and study guides, with exams carrying major importance.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize heavily weighted tests, while in-person reviews , and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed but mostly positive, especially for lower math, where students , and .

Main concern

Stats and some sections can feel test heavy, fast, or insufficiently supported.

What students said

“He breaks down the material really good and was a .”
MATH420
“Horrible .”
STAT10
“Not an easy A but if you work hard it's possible.”
MATH65B

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are consistently negative, with , and limited support.

Main concern

Online students report needing outside help because instructor support is weak.

What students said

“ !”
STAT10
“ and professor is rude and doesn't want to help his students.”
STAT10
“However , and very time consuming.”
STAT10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but generally standard, with hard tests in some sections balanced by practice materials, , and dropped scores in others.

Test HeavyPractice ExamsStudy GuidesDropped Lowest TestExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention tests, practice exams, study guides, , and dropped low exams, but they .

Practice ExamsStudy GuidesDropped Lowest TestExtra Credit
“ and .”
MATH65B
“There are quite a few tests, but semester!”
STAT10

Online

Online reviews mention hard and heavily weighted tests, but they do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or .

Hard TestsTest HeavyHeavily Weighted Tests
“ and professor is rude and doesn't want to help his students.”
STAT10
“ a lot of participation and homework!”
STAT10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not an easy A but if you work hard it's possible.”

Voice snapshots generated from 48 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“ .”

⚖️

67/100

“ if your answer is wrong.”

📚 Online Risk

25/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He breaks down everything and makes it super easy!!!
  • He went step by step by step and gave multiple examples.
  • and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Not an easy A but if you work hard it's possible.
  • and gives study guides beforehand.
  • .

Theme 3

🧪 About Tests And Workload

  • and only 10 percent, tests are really hard and professor is not helping at all.
  • and .
  • All HW is online(mystatlab cost $100) and he doesn't go over them.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

48

Recent reviews read by the AI

48

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 48 reviews across a long time span, with and course-pattern differences despite mixed opinions.

Inside 48 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 511
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 59

Course coverage

MATH42513 reviews
STAT1010 reviews
MATH4106 reviews
STATS104 reviews
MATH4203 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH5103 reviews
MATH252 reviews
MATH65A2 reviews
MATH65B2 reviews
4101 review
MATH311 review
MATH69661 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 6

B range

12

B+ 5 · B 4 · B- 3

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Audit/No Grade 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 2