AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Mark Micklich

CHEM104 · CHEM150 · PHSCI10 · CHEM24B · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Consider him mainly for online PHSCI10 if you can manage labs independently, but .

Best fit · Self Taught ProOnline can be straightforwardHeavy lab workloadDisorganized grading complaintsFast email repliesIn-person risk
  • Online PHSCI10 reviews are often positive, describing straightforward assignments, fast responses, and open-note exams.
  • Several reviews report excessive , and disorganization.
  • In-person chemistry and and warn against taking him.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some online students earned A grades with straightforward work, but others say it is not an easy A because labs and PDFs require substantial effort.

Online has the clearest path to high grades, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The content can be straightforward online, but labs, chemistry concepts, and many students.

Online PHSCI10 sounds more manageable, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do , though participation and weekly labs matter in several sections.

Online evidence emphasizes deadlines and labs, while policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

47/100

Recommendation depends heavily on format, because online PHSCI10 has several positive reviews but in-person and some online chemistry reviews are strongly negative.

Online reviews are split but include recommendations, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Students mention , and very specific answer expectations.

Format shift

Strict grading complaints appear in both online and and .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Workload is repeatedly described as heavy because of , and discussion work.

Format shift

Online workload ranges from reasonable to overwhelming, while the in-person PHSCI10 review describes it as excessive.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Positive online reviews praise responsiveness and helpful notes, but negative reviews describe disorganization, confusion, and poor instruction.

Format shift

Online teaching is mixed with several helpful experiences, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades appear , and written proof of answers.

Format shift

Online reviews mention midterms, final exams, homework, labs, and discussions, while , and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, poor organization, tough grading, and weak teaching support.

Main concern

Students report poor instruction and .

What students said

“ .”
CHEM150
“This man has no idea what he is doing.”
CHEM24B
“The amount of .”
PHSCI10

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed but lean more workable, with , and .

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“The lectures and .”
PHSCI10
“ .”
PHSCI10
“One of the .”
CHEM104

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Online exam evidence is student-friendly where specified, but test-heavy and pop-quiz comments.

Open Notes ExamsUnlimited Time On TestsTwo MidtermsFinal ExamPop Quizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and pop quizzes, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring policy.

Test HeavyPop Quizzes
“Test heavy”
CHEM150
“Beware of pop quizzes”
CHEM150

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention open-note exams and unlimited time on midterms or proctoring rules.

Open Notes ExamsUnlimited Time On TestsTwo MidtermsFinal Exam
“ .”
PHSCI10
“ ”
PHSCI10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I took this class online and it was .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and in-person risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“One of the .”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“We had an endless mountain of assignments.”

🧪 Online Strength

47/100

“ !”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Classes

  • The lectures and .
  • He is the !
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Workload And Grades

  • This was NOT an easy A.
  • The as hell.
  • His assignments are easy, there is 2 midterms, final and and there.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization And Support

  • One of the .
  • Professor didnt go by syllabus and wasnt helpful.
  • The .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews give useful but uneven evidence, with strong format differences and most detail concentrated in PHSCI10.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

PHSCI106 reviews
CHEM1041 review
CHEM1501 review
CHEM24B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1