AI Rate Professor

Art

David Deany

ART14 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a and rewards sincere effort.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring mentorStrong feedbackTechnique builderChallenging but fairHighly recommended
  • Both reviews give perfect quality ratings and , and .
  • The but success is realistic with effort and advice.
  • Both students earned A grades, suggesting fair reward for engaged work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Both reviewers earned A grades, and the comments suggest students can succeed if they try and ask for advice.

Both online and , but the sample is only one review per format.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The class is supportive and skill-building, though .

Online evidence directly mentions challenging projects, while and support.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Both students , and teaching support.

Online and format-based recommendation conflict.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Both students earned A grades, and the online review says effort and asking for advice lead to success.

Format shift

Both formats show positive grade outcomes, but .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The only workload clue is that projects can be challenging, but they appear manageable with effort and feedback.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions project challenge, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Both reviews describe him as caring, helpful, and highly recommendable, with clear support for student growth.

Format shift

Both online and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The and technique-building rather than exams.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions projects directly, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The , and recommendation.

Main concern

The review provides little detail about workload or .

What students said

“ and I learned a lot from him.”
ART14
“ .”
ART14

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The online review is very positive and says he helps students improve techniques while but achievable.

Main concern

if students do not seek advice or put in effort.

What students said

“Really helps you build on your techniques!”
ART14
“The but if you really try and ask for advice, you will succeed!”
ART14

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, or final requirements.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Deany is one for .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching support, challenge, and recommendation. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“ and I learned a lot from him.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

95/100

“ .”

🎨 Skill Growth

68/100

“Really helps you build on your techniques!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is super cool and down to earth!
  • and I learned a lot from him.

Theme 2

📈 About Challenge And Success

  • The but if you really try and ask for advice, you will succeed!
  • Really helps you build on your techniques!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

, so the sentiment is very positive but the evidence base is small.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART142 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values