AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Melissa King

ANTHRO102 · ANTHOPOLOGY3 · ANTHR6375 · ANTHRO3 · ANTHR3 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want an engaging anthropology professor where steady notes and basic effort are strongly rewarded.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear lecturesCaringInteresting classExtra creditFair grading
  • Students consistently describe King as , and engaging.
  • Grades are , and participation.
  • The main drawback is fast talking and lecture-heavy delivery.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

High grades appear very reachable with , and participation, with helping further.

Online evidence sounds especially flexible, while and steady class work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The material is approachable because and keeps lectures interesting, though some classes require writing and critical thinking.

Online and in-person reviews both suggest manageable difficulty, with and participation focused.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

as strictly mandatory, but several reviews say notes, participation, and class engagement matter.

and participation more than the single online review.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend her because , and fair.

Both formats are positive, but the online conclusion is based on only one review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

Students report fair grading, , and very achievable A grades with normal effort.

Format shift

Online grading seems especially flexible, while but tied to notes and participation.

Workload

Light

82/100

, and little assigned work, though some note-taking is needed.

Format shift

The online review explicitly says little work, while , and notes.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students repeatedly praise her clear explanations, caring support, interesting lectures, and passion for teaching.

Format shift

Both formats praise her teaching, with stronger evidence from the larger in-person sample.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears , and a final.

Format shift

The online review mentions midterm and final, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly positive, emphasizing clear teaching, interesting lectures, and fair paths to high grades.

Main concern

Students , and keep up with fast lectures.

What students said

“ and home works and pay attention in class and that will pretty much guarantee you an A.”
ANTHR3
“She talks really fast but she also posts all the materials online so it worked out well.”
ANTHRO102

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The online review is highly positive, with flexible due dates, low workload, , and .

Main concern

The online evidence is limited to one older review.

What students said

“She doesn't assign much work and offers flexible due dates, but offers if you turn in by the suggested due date as well as other extra credit opportunities.”
ANTHRO102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is student-friendly overall because one online review says the midterm and and .

Take-Home MidtermTake-Home FinalTests From Notes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

83/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

notes, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Tests From Notes
“ and you should have .”
ANTHRO3

Online

The online review says the midterm and , and reviews do not clearly prove webcam or proctoring rules.

Take-Home MidtermTake-Home Final
“ and you'll do well on the midterm and .”
ANTHRO102

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Shes honestly so smart and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“She is great. she explains things very clearly and are stuck.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

94/100

“ IF YOU CAN!!!!”

📈 Easy Grade Path

86/100

“ and home works and pay attention in class and that will pretty much guarantee you an A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures weren't boring at all.
  • Makes the class really interesting.
  • She talks really fast but she also posts all the materials online so it worked out well.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Professor King was not too easy or not too hard, just do the Hw and you'll do fine I got an A in the class
  • She is a .
  • She doesn't assign much work and offers flexible due dates

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • she emails back easily and quickly.
  • .
  • are stuck.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews span many years and show a consistent positive pattern with , and exams.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ANTHR34 reviews
ANTHRO1022 reviews
ANTHRO32 reviews
ANTHOPOLOGY31 review
ANTHR63751 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values