AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Stewart Contreras

ENGIN26 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if and rely on classmates or self-teaching for clarification.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear gradingEasy contentInconsistent lecturesPoor assignment guidanceLimited helpfulness
  • The course content is easy, but necessary.
  • Both reviews criticize missing rubrics, unclear grading, or assignments before instruction.
  • The small review count limits certainty, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

The class content is easy and one student earned an A, but unpredictable.

All evidence is from online reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

Students explicitly say the class is very easy, even though the professor's organization adds difficulty.

Only online reviews exist, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly discuss attendance rules or participation requirements.

, and there is no in-person evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Students do not recommend the experience because , and weak responses create frustration.

All recommendation evidence is negative and comes from online reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

because rubrics and criteria are missing or unclear.

Format shift

Online reviews consistently criticize grading clarity, with no in-person comparison.

Workload

Light

75/100

The workload and content seem light, but .

Format shift

Only online reviews describe the class as .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Students report unclear grading, inconsistent lecture quality, contradictory guidance, and unhelpful responses.

Format shift

Only online teaching is reviewed, and the evidence is mostly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Reviews focus on assignments, rubrics, and exams.

Format shift

Online evidence centers on assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students say the class itself is easy, but , and .

Main concern

Students do not know grading expectations until after work is graded.

What students said

“The class is very easy, but the professor makes it harder than it needs to be.”
ENGIN-26
“Professor Contreras doesn't have any rubrics for any of ”
ENGIN-26
“Lecture videos vary drastically in quality.”
ENGIN-26

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention exams only in relation to missing rubrics, and they .

Exam Rubrics MissingPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews say exams lack rubrics, but do not clearly prove webcam, .

Exam Rubrics MissingPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“Professor Contreras doesn't have any rubrics for any of ”
ENGIN-26

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The class is very easy, but the professor makes it harder than it needs to be.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and self-teaching risk. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Lecture videos vary drastically in quality.”

⚖️

30/100

“ a few weeks into the semester.”

📈 Course Easiness

82/100

“The class is very easy, but the professor makes it harder than it needs to be.”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • a few weeks into the semester.
  • Professor Contreras doesn't have any rubrics for any of

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lecture videos vary drastically in quality.
  • He's also super contradicting and assigns things that have yet to be taught.

Theme 3

🧭 About Getting Help

  • though.
  • You're going to need to make a study group to get clarification from your peers as ...

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and they are detailed but too few for high certainty.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGIN-262 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values