AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Cleopatre Thelus

PSYCH1 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
15.38%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

unless you are ready for , and heavy independent work.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh GraderLate AssignmentsHeavy ReadingStressful WorkloadLow Support
  • Most and .
  • Online and heavy discussion work.
  • A small minority found the course fair if they deeply understood the material and managed time well.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

One student called it an easy A, but , and failures make an A costly.

The Easy A evidence comes almost entirely from online reviews, while the but too limited.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The , and detailed discussion posts rather than simple recall.

Online reviews describe challenging workload and grading, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though participation and lecture engagement appear important.

Online reviews focus on assignments and grading, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Most students do not recommend her because , and the class was stressful.

Online sentiment is strongly negative, while the but not enough to offset the pattern.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Students overwhelmingly describe grading as very tough, rough, and difficult to satisfy.

Format shift

, while the single in-person-labeled review calls expectations fair.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students report lots of , and assignments released close to deadlines.

Format shift

Online reviews show heavy workload, while the and examples without workload complaints.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Most comments , and a professor who students felt did not care.

Format shift

, while the single in-person-labeled review is positive but isolated.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

, and reading-based work rather than one dominant assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussions, assignments, exams, and papers, while the and examples.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single in-person-labeled review is positive and , but it also states the course was online only.

Main concern

The evidence is too limited and internally mixed on format to generalize the in-person experience.

What students said

“She is a very fair teacher, what she expects and there are no tricks.”
PSYCH1

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are strongly negative, centered , and low support.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say the very difficult.

What students said

“She was the so tough it was practically impossible to pass her class”
PSYCH1
“ as if she almost does not want anyone to succeed in her course”
PSYCH1
“This professor does not release the assignments until 2 days before the due date so if you are a procrastinator or not a fast worker, you may struggle a bit.”
PSYCH1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention exams and test-heavy work, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or a .

Test HeavyNo Final MentionedExam Difficulty Unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The single in-person-labeled review .

Online

and one review , but proctoring and open-book policies are not clearly proven.

Test HeavyNo Final Mentioned
“ but not bad. ".”
PSYCH1
“ and sends long useless lectures.”
PSYCH1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ as if she almost does not want anyone to succeed in her course”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“She is very degrading in her comments and makes you feel like you failed.”

⚖️

10/100

“Honestly, the teacher is a .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

15/100

“0/10 would .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This professor does not care whether you pass or not.
  • She makes me dislike the subject.
  • Long lectures and biased comments.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It is very easy to fail this class.
  • but getting a perfect score is difficult.
  • .

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • There were a lot of assignments but no problem with time management.
  • . Course was based on nothing but .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews over multiple terms show a consistent online pattern of and low recommendation, though .

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 59

Course coverage

PSYCH113 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

1

D+ 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values