AI Rate Professor

American Sign Language

Thomas Hauser

ASL1 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

unless you can learn independently and , and strict class expectations.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganized teachingTough gradingAttendance pressureHomework heavy
  • Students say the ASL material itself is easy, but the professor makes the course frustrating.
  • Both reviews rate teaching quality at the lowest level and .
  • Attendance and participation appear important, but students do not describe that structure as helpful.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

The material may be easy, but , and poor support make earning a strong grade unreliable.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Students say the ASL content is easy, but the professor's teaching makes it feel harder than it should.

All course-difficulty evidence comes from in-person ASL1 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

One student says he calls students out by email after missing more than about five classes.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Low ratings and comments about unhelpful teaching, disorganization, and .

The recommendation signal .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

, and reported outcomes are an Incomplete and a C.

Format shift

All grading evidence comes from in-person ASL1 reviews.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

One review directly tags lots of homework, and another says participation and tests matter.

Format shift

Workload evidence exists only for in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students describe him as , and unable to teach clearly.

Format shift

no online evidence available.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Comments mention assignments, papers, participation, and method.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students describe easy material made harder by unclear teaching, unhelpful communication, and .

Main concern

The main risk is poor teaching support despite manageable course content.

What students said

“The material is easy, it is the professor that makes it hard.”
ASL1
“He's a good guy but and don't know how to teach”
ASL1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

One review tags the class as test heavy, but comments .

Test HeavyReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but reviews do not clearly prove quiz, midterm, final, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Test HeavyReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“He's a good guy but and don't know how to teach”
ASL1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The material is easy, it is the professor that makes it hard.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“He is unhelpful when you ask questions.”

⚖️

22/100

“He's a good guy but and don't know how to teach”

📌

15/100

“He will call you out in your in if you skip more than like 5 classes even if .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The material is easy, it is the professor that makes it hard.
  • He is unhelpful when you ask questions.
  • He's a good guy but and don't know how to teach

Theme 2

📈 About Work And Grades

  • He will call you out in your in if you skip more than like 5 classes even if .
  • He answers your emails but be something completely different.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, though both give the same low teaching rating.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ASL12 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1