AI Rate Professor

Communication Studies

Michael Brydges

COMSTD72 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
9/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

unless you have no alternative and , and strict grading.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerOverwhelming workloadUnclear directionsHarsh gradingPoor communicationNot recommended
  • Both reviews describe a very poor learning experience.
  • Students , and weak communication.
  • The online review reports especially heavy module volume and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

One student earned an A, but comments show the grade requires pushing , and heavy workload.

Online evidence shows strict and , while in-person evidence shows excessive work with a lower reported grade.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course feels hard mainly because directions, communication, and workload make the material harder to manage.

Both formats report difficulty, with and in-person reviews emphasizing unnecessary work.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do not clearly discuss attendance rules or .

Neither online nor in-person evidence clearly proves an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students do not recommend him because they describe , and strict grading.

Both formats are negative, with the online review giving more detail about workload and grading.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

The and unclear, and both reviews describe frustration with assignments.

Format shift

Online , while in-person evidence supports frustration but not a .

Workload

Overwhelming

8/100

Both reviews describe too much work, with the online review citing over 21 sub-modules in one week.

Format shift

Online workload sounds especially extreme, while as excessive and unnecessary.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students describe , and a deeply disappointing teaching style.

Format shift

Both formats are strongly negative, with online evidence giving more specific examples.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The reviews focus on papers, assignments, modules, and .

Format shift

Online evidence mentions strict assignments and many modules, while and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The unnecessary work and poor communication from a communications professor.

Main concern

The student found the workload excessive and the teaching disappointing.

What students said

“He gives out too much work that is completely unnecessary.”
COMSTD72
“He is not very good at communicating”
COMSTD72
“ unless you really have to.”
COMSTD72

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The online fast-track review describes unclear assignments, excessive weekly modules, , and unhelpful videos.

Main concern

The workload and directions are described as unreasonable and confusing.

What students said

“He once posted over 21+ sub-modules for one week.”
COMSTD72
“ .”
COMSTD72
“Very unreasonable workload and nonsensical videos that don't help you.”
COMSTD72

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove an , midterm, or final structure.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, closed-book rules, quiz format, midterm format, final format, or proctoring.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ unless you really have to.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, directions, and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“He is not very good at communicating even though he is a communications professor.”

⚖️

18/100

“gives very unclear and .”

📚 Workload

8/100

“He once posted over 21+ sub-modules for one week.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Not a good professor, I took his fast track online class.
  • He is not very good at communicating
  • nonsensical videos that don't help you.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • He gives out too much work that is completely unnecessary.
  • Very unreasonable workload
  • He once posted over 21+ sub-modules for one week.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Directions and Grading

  • .
  • and .
  • unless you really have to.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Only 2 reviews are available, but both are detailed, recent enough, and consistently negative across formats.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

COMSTD722 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values