AI Rate Professor

Psychology

M. dilorenzo

PSYCH65 · PSYCH25 · PSYCHOLOGY1 · PSYCH80 · PSYCHOLOGY25 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
62.5%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take her if and feedback, but be ready to read and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring ProfessorHelpful FeedbackReading RequiredTough Grading RiskInteresting Lectures
  • Positive reviews describe her as , and .
  • Negative reviews , and feeling the .
  • The experience appears better for students who use office hours, read consistently, and follow writing prompts closely.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

An A is possible with reading, , and clear expectations, but and F grades show real risk.

In-person reviews sound more grade-friendly, while and workload complaints.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The , but , and papers add moderate challenge.

Online evidence is more mixed, while and understandable.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Reviews emphasize office hours, lectures, and preparation but .

Both formats suggest engagement matters, but neither clearly states a .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

67/100

Most positive students value her caring teaching and feedback, while a few strongly advise against taking her.

, while online reviews are split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Clear criteria and help, but several reviews call her a and grades range down to F.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews mention clearer support and .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload and papers depending on course and format.

Format shift

Online reviews mention more homework and research-paper pressure, while .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most students describe her as , and helpful, despite a few strongly negative reviews.

Format shift

In-person teaching reviews are stronger, while online reviews are more polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Assessment includes reading-based tests, papers, writing assignments, and some rather than a single dominant method.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize papers and reading, while , and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are mostly positive and , and strong support.

Main concern

Reading and tests can punish students who do not prepare.

What students said

“she definitely has an encouraging way with students.”
Psych80
“She does offer and .”
PSYCH25
“Make sure you read the book are .”
PSYCH25

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are polarized, with one excellent review and two , and the research paper.

Main concern

Online and limited discussion.

What students said

“ not worth it.”
PSYCH65
“ and the research paper made me think differently about how I write.”
Psych80
“Her PowerPoint .”
PSYCH65

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and , but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or webcam use.

Tests MentionedStudy GuidesNo Makeups MentionedResearch Paper

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and , but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

TestsStudy GuidesNo Makeup Tests
“Make sure you read the book are .”
PSYCH25
“The study guides will prepare you for the tests.”
PSYCHOLOGY25
“Does not so be prepared”
PSYCH25

Online

Online reviews mention a research paper and workload, but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, open-book rules, or Lockdown Browser.

Research Paper
“the write.”
Psych80

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She cares for her students and it shows! ”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Her lectures are super interesting she explains things in a way that you will understand.”

⚖️

48/100

“ ”

📚 Workload Balance

55/100

“good amount of workload!! and only 1 essay required but she helps you out so much with writing it!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Dr. DiLorenzo was an amazing professor, she definitely has an encouraging way with students.
  • She cares for her students and it shows!
  • She applies real life stories to concepts for better understanding.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Make sure you read the book are .
  • She does offer and .
  • not worth it.

Theme 3

📝 About Writing & Work

  • only 1 essay required but she helps you out so much with writing it!
  • There are only 4 small writing assignments.
  • the write.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews across online and but mixed evidence, with recent reviews sharply divided.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

Psych804 reviews
PSYCH252 reviews
PSYCH652 reviews
PSYCHOLOGY12 reviews
PSYCHOLOGY251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values