AI Rate Professor

Statistics

Pilar Olid

STAT10 · STATS10 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

Take Pilar Olid only if you can handle a demanding asynchronous statistics course with lots of work and limited live structure.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy WorkloadTough GradingTedious LecturesLimited GuidanceCaring but Demanding
  • Online STAT10 reviews consistently describe a heavy weekly workload with many assignments, quizzes, and videos.
  • Most students found lectures tedious or not helpful enough, though one student strongly praised her support.
  • Getting an A is possible, but comments say it requires steady work, prior statistics comfort, and no shortcuts.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

A grades appear possible, but students describe tough grading, no , and a lot of required weekly work.

All evidence comes from online reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The statistics content is manageable for students with prior experience but hard for others because of word problems and weak guidance.

All course difficulty evidence comes from online STAT10 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

75/100

The course appears asynchronous with no mandatory meetings, though one review says skipping work or class hurts performance.

Online reviews mention asynchronous structure and no mandatory meetings; there is no in-person evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

because the workload is heavy, lectures are tedious, and .

Recommendation evidence is only from online reviews and is mostly negative despite one very positive review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students repeatedly call her a and say there is no , even though some earned A grades.

Format shift

, and they consistently lean strict.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Students , and discussion posts every week.

Format shift

All workload evidence is online and .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Several students say lectures are tedious and guidance is weak, while one and wants students to succeed.

Format shift

Online reviews are mixed, but negative teaching comments outnumber positive ones.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews emphasize , and group projects more than major exams.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the only assessment evidence and and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are polarized but lean negative because students , and tedious recorded lectures.

Main concern

The main concern is a high workload with lectures that many students found slow or unhelpful.

What students said

“No proper guidance on how to do your work yet expect 5 assignments+quiz every week.”
STAT10
“SO MUCH WORK! So many videos, so many assignments!”
STAT10
“Shes a and gives no .”
STATS10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes but do not clearly prove the requirements.

Weekly QuizzesNo Clear Proctoring EvidenceNo Clear Open-Book Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes but do not clearly prove proctoring, .

Weekly QuizzesNo Clear Proctoring EvidenceNo Clear Open-Book Evidence
“expect 5 assignments+quiz every week.”
STAT10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“SO MUCH WORK! So many videos, so many assignments!”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Her video lectures are tedious and incredibly long, she emphasizes everything.”

📚 Workload Pressure

15/100

“No proper guidance on how to do your work yet expect 5 assignments+quiz every week.”

⚖️

25/100

“Shes a and gives no .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • 30min long lecture videos of her JUST reading what you can read yourself in 30 seconds.
  • Her video lectures are tedious and incredibly long, she emphasizes everything.
  • This professor is AMAZING she WANTS you to succeed she does give you info on how to be a better student.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • !!
  • I did really well in this class because it was my second time taking stats, otherwise I think it would be pretty hard.
  • Do all your work no cutting corners!

Theme 3

🧾 About Workload

  • SO MUCH WORK! So many videos, so many assignments!
  • Lots of time is wasted with and meditation that are very condescending.
  • No proper guidance on how to do your work yet expect 5 assignments+quiz every week.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed reviews across 2021 to 2023 are consistent on workload and grading, but all are for one online course format.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

STAT104 reviews
STATS101 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values