AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Amanda Barnes-Kennedy

ANTHRO1L · BIOANTHRO7 · ANTHR1L · ANTH1 · ANTHRO1 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want an engaging anthropology professor and can study seriously for exams, but be cautious with the online format.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing lecturesExtra creditTest heavyCaringHard-working A
  • In-person students mostly describe her as caring, engaging, and knowledgeable.
  • Grades are helped by easy assignments and , but .
  • The single online review and heavy textbook searching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

and , but several students say exams still require real study.

The Easy A evidence is mainly in person, while the online review reports a difficult experience and only a B.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The content is understandable with good lectures in person, but tests and online textbook searching make it more than an effortless intro course.

In-person students find the class engaging and manageable, while the online review finds the and time-consuming.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, while most other reviews do not clearly discuss attendance rules.

; the online review does not establish an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most in-person students strongly recommend her for caring teaching and engaging lectures, but the online review is a .

In-person reviews are highly favorable, while the only .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Assignments are graded easily and often .

Format shift

; the online review does not describe grading leniency.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Students mention lots of class work, reading, and exam preparation, but .

Format shift

The online review reports heavy textbook searching, while .

Teaching experience

Good

86/100

In-person students praise her caring personality, knowledge, humor, and lectures, but the .

Format shift

Teaching quality looks excellent in person and weak online based on the single online review.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and a non-cumulative final, with exams carrying meaningful weight.

Format shift

and assignments clearly; online assessment structure is not clearly described.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly positive, with , and hard but .

Main concern

and are forgiving.

What students said

“Best professor I .”
ANTH1
“Grades easily but the tests (2 for 50 pts and 1 non-cumulative final for 100 pts) are fairly hard relative to the assignments.”
ANTHRO1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and heavy textbook searching for information.

Main concern

Students may need to rely heavily on the .

What students said

“ and long for no reason.”
ANTH1
“i find myself playing a scavenger hunt in the textbook for any information about fossils for hours on end.”
ANTH1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews prove that tests and a , but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring rules.

Difficult TestsNon-Cumulative FinalTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a non-cumulative final, but do not clearly prove book rules or .

Difficult TestsNon-Cumulative FinalTest Heavy
“The , but with the I still ended up with an A.”
ANTHRO1L
“ , but still worth 20% of grade.”
ANTH1

Online

The online review does not clearly prove the format.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great class. She's a funny teacher who cares about her students. , but she makes you work hard for exams.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“Best professor I .”

📈 Grade Path

78/100

“I failed the 1st and got B's on the last 2 and ended up with an A because I had 105% for .”

⚠️ Online Warning

40/100

“ if you can.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very knowledgeable and easy to pay attention to!
  • She'll make you fall in love with anthro.
  • Professor Barnes-Kennedy is really nice and super easy to talk to.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You have to work for your grade in this class.
  • , but she makes you work hard for exams.
  • There is no reason you should get anything less than an A in her class.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • The , but with the I still ended up with an A.
  • Grades easily but the tests (2 for 50 pts and 1 non-cumulative final for 100 pts) are fairly hard relative to the assignments.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across several years give useful patterns, but the online conclusion is based on only one review.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ANTH13 reviews
ANTHR1L1 review
ANTHRO11 review
ANTHRO1L1 review
BIOANTHRO71 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 3 · A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values