AI Rate Professor

Art

Catherine (Nicole) Farrand

ART15 · ART18 · ART16 · ART10 · ART14 · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
92.31%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want a and helps beginners improve.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring MentorGenerous Late PolicyHelpful FeedbackRelaxing Art ClassEncouraging Studio Atmosphere
  • Students consistently describe Farrand as caring, encouraging, and highly supportive.
  • Grades are very forgiving when students complete projects and show effort.
  • The main challenge is the time and craft effort required for .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

An A is very reachable because , and effort on projects matters more than perfect skill.

Online evidence highlights full-credit late submissions, while and showing effort usually earns a strong grade.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The courses are approachable and beginner-friendly, but , and comfort with materials like paint or gouache.

Online reviews mention more workload friction, while as relaxing and enjoyable.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

Participation matters in some studio classes, but reviews do not show a .

In-person reviews mention participation and , while online reviews focus on assignment deadlines instead of attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and helps students improve while .

Both formats are recommended, with and online reviews still mostly positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

Students repeatedly say she is lenient, accepts late work, gives , and rewards effort.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize deadline flexibility, while .

Workload

Moderate

61/100

The workload is manageable but and sometimes feel heavy.

Format shift

Online students mention lots of , while in-person students frame the work as enjoyable studio practice.

Teaching experience

Excellent

97/100

Reviews consistently describe her as , and effective at helping students grow.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide the richest evidence of her supportive teaching, while online and personality.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

12/100

Grades appear to , and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats focus on project work, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly positive, emphasizing encouragement, feedback, skill growth, and a relaxed class atmosphere.

Main concern

.

What students said

“It is basically impossible to fail this class.”
ART14
“Do the projects and it's an easy A.”
ART10
“tough BUT . !”
ART16

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews praise her feedback, lenient deadlines, and , though some students found the art workload or .

Main concern

and paint-heavy.

What students said

“She's very lenient with grading and gives when you turn in stuff early or right on time!”
ART15
“She lets you submit everything on the last day of the semester for full credit.”
ART10
“ .”
ART10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and assessment appears mainly project-based.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam PolicyProject-Based Assessment

Assessment risk

Varies

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book, quiz, midterm, or final policies.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She sets you up for success and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

97/100

“She sets you up for success and .”

⚖️

92/100

“It is basically impossible to fail this class.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's very encouraging and and she gives excellent instructions and .
  • She gives you good critique & helped me bring out the artist in me.
  • Professor Farrand was very encouraging throughout the whole semester.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Do the projects and it's an easy A.
  • If you're willing to put in the effort there's no reason why anybody shouldn't walk out of that class with anything less than an "A" no matter your skill level.
  • She's a bit of a , but it's only because she sees potential in everyone.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and always wanted us to do well in her classand life.
  • and fair.
  • she's .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-five reviews across many years are consistent, detailed, and and .

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART109 reviews
ART167 reviews
ART155 reviews
ART143 reviews
ART181 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 4 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1