AI Rate Professor

Nutrition & Foods

Christine Crocker

NF5 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

if you value structure and feedback, but expect , and strict citation standards.

Best fit · Effort For RewardResponsiveDetailed FeedbackStructured FormatTough GraderReading Heavy
  • , and accessibility.
  • The course rewards organized work but can punish formatting and citation mistakes.
  • Workload is meaningful, with reading, discussions, and writing expectations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Grades seem achievable with , but strict formatting, citations, reading, and .

Online reviews mention required tools and detailed tasks, while and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The material can be enjoyable, but the , and structured responses.

Online reviews call the material fun but work-heavy, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation matters is mentioned, but reviews do .

Online evidence mentions participation, while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Students recommend her when they value responsiveness and feedback, but and workload.

Online reviews lean positive overall, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

but grades closely on organization, sourcing, plagiarism, and formatting.

Format shift

Both formats show strict expectations, with .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students mention , and a video recipe assignment.

Format shift

Online reviews give stronger workload detail, while .

Teaching experience

Good

75/100

Most students describe her as , and strong at feedback despite strict expectations.

Format shift

Online reviews are positive about access and material, while but .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Assessment appears centered on discussions, essays, presentations, citations, and projects rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Online evidence explicitly says the fast track class has no final, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and warning that grading is very tough on format and sources.

Main concern

Formatting and citations can strongly affect grades.

What students said

“Very structured and you are rewarded for presenting in .”
NF5
“Super tough grader, who makes you pay for an $80 book.”
NF5

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews describe accessible teaching and fun material, but , and .

Main concern

, and structured discussion responses.

What students said

“Super fun material. I loved the class.”
NF5
“Cengage e-textbook with mindtap will be required.”
NF5

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The class had no final and used an essay plus video recipe instead.

No Final In Fast TrackEssayVideo Recipe

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Online

One online review says the fast and uses an essay and video recipe.

No Final In Fast TrackEssayVideo Recipe
“Fast , but an essay and video recipe.”
NF5

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very structured and you are rewarded for presenting in .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessment style. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

75/100

“She is a professor that and great at returning emails quickly.”

⚖️

35/100

“Formatting and grammar in a science class is the majority of how you get graded.”

📚 Workload Design

35/100

“ and expects an embedded picture in response.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Loved Dr. Crocker and , and feedback.
  • Super fun material. I loved the class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very structured and you are rewarded for presenting in .
  • Super tough grader, who makes you pay for an $80 book.

Theme 3

📚 About Assignments

  • Cengage e-textbook with mindtap will be required.
  • Fast , but an essay and video recipe.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews across online and but mixed evidence, with and strict standards.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NF54 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1