AI Rate Professor

Earth Science

Mussie Okbamicheal

ESCL5 · ESLAB · ESC5 · ESC1 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
21/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Avoid the online version unless and , while older in-person evidence is more forgiving.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHeavy readingWeak online teachingHelpful in personAccent barrier
  • Online reviews describe harsh , and weak teaching support.
  • In-person reviews are older but more positive, describing him as .
  • Getting an A looks difficult because comments emphasize no curve, no , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A seems costly because online reviews cite no curve, no , tough grading, and unfair quizzes despite some older in-person easy-class comments.

Online evidence is strongly negative for grades, while and more lenient.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content is not always described as hard, but , and weak explanations make it feel more difficult.

Online reviews make the course feel harder, while and lecture reviews describe easier material when prepared.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but participation and coming prepared appear important in several reviews.

Online reviews mention participation matters, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Recommendation is low because recent , and teaching effort.

Online reviews mostly discourage taking him, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly call him a tough grader and mention no curve, no , and .

Format shift

Harsh grading evidence comes mainly from online reviews, while .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Online comments mention lots of , and students doing much of the work themselves.

Format shift

Online workload is described as heavy, while and weekly lab packets.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Online students describe weak teaching and unfair testing, but older in-person students describe him as helpful and friendly.

Format shift

Online teaching experience is poor, while and more positive but note an accent barrier.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and lab packets rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize quizzes and tests, while , and lab packets.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and the class can be easy, but his accent can make lectures .

Main concern

Lecture comprehension may be hard because multiple students mention a strong accent.

What students said

“he has a bad accent that makes it hard to understand his lectures.”
ESC1
“Very friendly, very helpful, takes the time to make sure students understand the material.”
ESC5
“The class was very easy.”
ESLAB

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report tough , and little teaching support.

Main concern

Students may need to teach themselves while .

What students said

“No and .”
ESC1
“He is a and expects his students to know everything about earthsci and then makes the quizes imposible.”
ESC1
“ and oddly specific.”
ESCL5

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because students describe unfair, specific tests and proctoring policies.

Unfair TestsOddly Specific TestsImpossible QuizzesStudy Guide Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

guides but do not clearly prove closed-book rules, proctoring, or open-book policies.

Study Guide Exams
“ the study guide.”
ESC5

Online

Online reviews mention unfair, oddly specific tests and impossible quizzes but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Unfair TestsOddly Specific TestsImpossible Quizzes
“makes the quizes imposible.”
ESC1
“ and oddly specific.”
ESCL5

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is a and expects his students to know everything about earthsci and then makes the quizes imposible.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“ and oddly specific. He doesn't teach the material and posts videos related to the topic I think he could put in a bit more effort.”

⚖️

18/100

“No and .”

🏫 In-Person Contrast

55/100

“Very friendly, very helpful, takes the time to make sure students understand the material.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He doesn't teach the material and posts videos related to the topic I think he could put in a bit more effort.
  • he lacks dedication and doesnt put any work to what he does.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • No and .
  • He is a and expects his students to know everything about earthsci and then makes the quizes imposible.
  • and oddly specific.

Theme 3

🏫 About Format Differences

  • The class was very easy.
  • he has a bad accent that makes it hard to understand his lectures.
  • youll be doing more work than he ever does.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews provide useful format contrast, but the evidence.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ESC13 reviews
ESC52 reviews
ESCL52 reviews
ESLAB1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2