AI Rate Professor

Statistics

Erik Pachas

STATS10 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
5/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid Erik Pachas unless you are highly independent and ready for .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf TaughtHeavy HomeworkUnresponsiveExhaustingPoor Support
  • The only review describes a very negative online experience with little instructor help.
  • The workload is described as heavy and mentally exhausting.
  • The student says the professor did not answer email and left them to do everything alone.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

10/100

The only reported student earned a and little help, so getting an A appears very difficult from the available evidence.

Evidence comes only from one online review, with no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

The course felt very hard because the and was overwhelmed by the workload.

Evidence comes only from one online review, with no in-person evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

Evidence comes only from one online review, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The only review strongly discourages taking him because of , and unresponsiveness.

Evidence comes only from one negative online review, with no in-person evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

The review tags him as a and the only reported grade is a C after major effort.

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, and there is .

Workload

Overwhelming

5/100

The review directly says there was tons of homework and the class left students mentally exhausted.

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, and there is no in-person workload evidence.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

The review says he did not , and made the student do everything alone.

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, and there is no in-person teaching evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

The only assessment evidence points to tons of .

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, and but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The , and a self-taught experience.

Main concern

The student felt unsupported and mentally exhausted.

What students said

“I had to do everything myself.”
stats-10
“He gave tons of .”
stats-10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exams, proctoring, .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews do .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“At the end we were mentally exhausted, frustrated, and wanted to quit.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in support, workload, and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“he did not help me, I had to do everything myself.”

📚 Workload Pressure

5/100

“He gave tons of .”

👎 Recommendation Risk

5/100

“ if your a slow learner”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Support

  • he did not help me, I had to do everything myself.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Workload

  • He gave tons of homework
  • At the end we were mentally exhausted, frustrated, and wanted to quit.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

, so the evidence is vivid but too limited for strong confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

stats-101 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values