AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Italia Iossif

PHIL76 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
99/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a and helps students succeed.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring professorFair gradingHelpful feedbackExtra creditBeginner friendly
  • All four reviews are positive, with , and willingness to help.
  • Grades appear very attainable, supported by and .
  • Online students mention responsiveness, while and patient teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

High grades look attainable because she grades fairly, offers , and supports students, but .

Both formats show strong grade outcomes, with and in-person reviews stressing help and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Students expected philosophy to be harder, but her support and .

Online evidence is positive but brief, while easier than expected.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly establish .

Online and in-person comments .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

93/100

Every review is positive and , and helpful.

Both online and more enthusiastic.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

Students mention fair grading, , and strong support, with three A-range grades in four reviews.

Format shift

Both formats support grade friendliness, but .

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The only workload concern is that chapter outlines can be time consuming, while no review describes the course as overwhelming.

Format shift

Online reviews mention time-consuming notes, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Students describe her as , and one of .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize responsiveness, while and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews mention chapter note outlines and , but do not clearly describe exams as a .

Format shift

, while in-person evidence does not specify assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

as , and very helpful for students who expected the class to be hard.

Main concern

The small sample gives limited detail on exact workload and .

What students said

“She helps students a lot and wants them to pass and to learn.”
PHIL76
“she grades fairly”
PHIL76
“took her time in teaching all of her lessons.”
PHIL76

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews , and a generally positive experience, though chapter outlines can take time.

Main concern

Chapter note outlines may be time consuming.

What students said

“She responded quickly and answered all the questions.”
PHIL76
“It can become time consuming when it comes to outlining the chapter notes”
PHIL76
“overall good professor.”
PHIL76

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews do not clearly prove .

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She helps students a lot and wants them to pass and to learn.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching style. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“took her time in teaching all of her lessons.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

93/100

“ .”

⚖️

84/100

“she grades fairly”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She responded quickly and answered all the questions.
  • took her time in teaching all of her lessons.
  • She helps students a lot and wants them to pass and to learn.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Workload

  • It can become time consuming when it comes to outlining the chapter notes
  • she grades fairly

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is awesome! Very nice and funny.
  • she is one of the .
  • overall good professor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

46/100

Evidence confidence

, so the but the evidence base is small.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL764 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values