AI Rate Professor

Biology

Charles Jang

BIO22 · BIO1 · BIOL22 · PHYSI22 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

if you want a very demanding science course and , and tough grading.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerExtremely difficultHarsh gradingPop quizzesUnclear expectationsKnowledgeable but hard to follow
  • Students consistently describe the course as very hard, detail-heavy, and stressful.
  • and tests are harsh, with frequent pop quizzes and essay-heavy assessments.
  • A few students value his knowledge and willingness to stay after class, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

An A appears very hard because students , and still expecting only a C or passing grade.

The online review also says tests were too difficult, while grading and heavy effort.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

The science content is repeatedly described as complex, detail-heavy, and extremely challenging, especially physiology.

Both formats describe difficult content, but the and more consistent.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though pop quizzes and lecture-dependent testing make showing up important.

The online review gives no attendance evidence, while because of frequent quizzes and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students warn against taking him because the , and very hard to pass well.

The only online review is negative, and students recommending him for challenge.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Students repeatedly call him a tough or and say he takes points for small details with little partial credit.

Format shift

Online evidence says tests were unclear and too difficult, while .

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Reviews describe constant studying, , and sleepless nights.

Format shift

The online review emphasizes too much reading, while , and nonstop study.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

He is seen as knowledgeable and sometimes helpful after class, but many students say .

Format shift

The online review reports poor communication, while but mostly criticize clarity and teaching style.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Assessment appears dominated by quizzes, tests, essay sections, and .

Format shift

Online evidence mentions tests, while in-person , and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews mostly describe a very difficult, quiz-heavy class with , and mixed teaching clarity.

Main concern

The main concern is that students can study heavily and still struggle because expectations and .

What students said

“ .”
BIO22
“Be prepared for a lot of sleepless nights because .”
BIOL22
“Professor Jang is a great teacher but challenging.”
BIO22

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review reports heavy , and very difficult exams.

Main concern

Students may need to learn independently because the review says support and .

What students said

“ .”
BIO1
“ .”
BIO1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are described as difficult, detail-heavy, and strict, with .

Frequent Pop QuizzesEssay QuestionsHard TestsLittle Partial CreditUnclear Test Scope

Assessment risk

Strict

12/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews , and harsh grading, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring details.

Frequent Pop QuizzesEssay ExamsHard TestsHarsh Grading
“pop quizs almost every day.”
BIO22
“exams are 50 multiples choice and another 50 pts short essay questions.”
BIO22
“mostly essay.”
BIOL22

Online

The and exams were too difficult, but it does not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, webcam use, or Lockdown Browser.

Unclear Test ScopeHard Tests
“No clarity in what would really be on the test.”
BIO1
“Too difficult.”
BIO1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Be prepared to study every moment for next 18 wks, & still not receive A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Professor Jang may be a very intelligent man. However, he has difficulty communicating with his students.”

⚖️

10/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

12/100

“Be prepared for a lot of sleepless nights because .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He does know his stuff but he doesn't clarify what he wants
  • and intersting but .
  • Horrible teacher!!! All he does is read his powerpoints, doesn't give examples..go into detail...

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • study your butt off for an MAYBE a C .
  • Extremely difficult class. Finished course only by studying all the time.
  • Very hard class with .

Theme 3

📝

  • pop quizes all the .
  • ...
  • Very few hints of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews across many years show a consistent pattern of high difficulty, heavy studying, and .

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 55
2 out of 56
1 out of 53

Course coverage

BIO2211 reviews
BIOL225 reviews
BIO12 reviews
PHYSI221 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1