AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jane Yoo

STAT10 · MATH520 · MATH510 · MATH550 · MATH450 · MATH425 · MATH101 · STATS10 · MATH410 · 36 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
17.65%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

unless you are already strong in , and can handle strict grading.

Best fit · Self Taught ProFast-paced lecturesTough graderHeavy homeworkLow patienceTest and quiz heavy
  • Most students describe Yoo as very fast, difficult to follow, and impatient with questions.
  • and quizzes, with repeated complaints about strict or .
  • A if they studied hard, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Getting an A usually requires heavy self-study, keeping up with fast lectures, and and .

Both formats look difficult, with online pressure from Saturday exams and and frequent quizzes.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The math content may be standard, but the , and quick quizzes make it feel much harder.

The online review cites poor explanations, while and weak support.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Many reviews say skipping class is not viable, and one .

In-person reviews repeatedly flag attendance as necessary, while the online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

Most students warn against taking her because they found the , and help-seeking frustrating.

Both online and in-person evidence are negative, though .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students repeatedly describe tough, nitpicky, and and quizzes.

Format shift

, while the online review says exams were a major grade component.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Reviews often mention lots of , and fast coverage that requires extra study.

Format shift

Heavy workload appears in in-person reviews, while the online .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most comments , and students needing to teach themselves.

Format shift

Both formats criticize explanations, with and pacing.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Grades are repeatedly described as based mostly on tests, quizzes, and a few major exams.

Format shift

Both formats point toward exam-heavy grading, with online exams worth one third and and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews mostly report rushed , and frustration when students ask questions.

Main concern

Students often felt they had to teach themselves while being graded harshly.

What students said

“She goes over the material way too fast and .”
MATH410
“ but not collected or given credit on. Grades and quizes.”
MATH520

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The one online review is very negative and and hard to fit into an online schedule.

Main concern

Saturday exams and .

What students said

“She is hard to understand and .”
STATS10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and frequent in-person quizzes, but they do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Saturday ExamsGraded By Few ThingsFrequent QuizzesTest HeavyPop Quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes as central, difficult, frequent, and sometimes pop quizzes, but they do not clearly prove closed-book or .

Frequent QuizzesTest HeavyPop QuizzesDifficult Tests
“Grades and quizes.”
MATH520
“There's only 4 Big Tests and every thursday there's a quiz.”
520
“ them.”
MATH425

Online

The and made up one third of the grade, but it does not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Saturday ExamsGraded By Few Things
“ .”
STATS10
“These exams made up 1/3 of your grade”
STATS10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She goes over the material way too fast and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 36 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“She goes over the material way too fast and .”

⚖️

12/100

“Very very precise about how problems are written and .”

🧪

18/100

“Grades and quizes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She speeds through lectures, grades extremely hard and gets mad if you ask her questions.
  • Does not explain how to do problems, just goes through without no
  • she does examples and you have to keep up.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She's a and gives little to wiggle room!
  • Such a if you do not do it "her way" she will mark you down even though you get the correct answer.
  • Her grade and Quizs.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • . She expect you to know maths . Very rude when you ask questions. Pop quiz.
  • I had to via internet and the math lab
  • She humiliates students if they do not understand the material.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

36

Recent reviews read by the AI

36

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-six reviews across many years show strong consistency, detailed complaints, and a .

Inside 36 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 54
3 out of 56
2 out of 55
1 out of 518

Course coverage

MATH4258 reviews
MATH4106 reviews
MATH5205 reviews
STAT104 reviews
4102 reviews
Show 7 more courses
5202 reviews
MATH1012 reviews
MATH5102 reviews
STATS102 reviews
714761 review
MATH4501 review
MATH5501 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

11

Drop/Withdrawal 7 · Not sure yet 4