AI Rate Professor

Biology

Ignacio Rivera-Cuesta

BIO30 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if , and tolerate uneven lectures.

Best fit · Effort For RewardMixed TeachingTest HeavyExtra CreditTough GraderDisorganized
  • Students agree he can be knowledgeable and nice, but teaching quality is inconsistent.
  • Several reviews say quizzes or .
  • and , but the course still requires serious study.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

An A is possible with studying and , but tests and .

All evidence comes from In person reviews, with no Online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The class content is described as straightforward by one student, but and .

All evidence is In person, and no Online comparison exists.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Attendance is not always taken, but .

Only In .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Most reviews hesitate or advise against him because and some kindness.

Recommendation evidence is entirely In person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Students mention and , but also tough grading and poor lecture-test alignment.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

There is , but students still need to study vocab, PowerPoints, quizzes, and a .

Format shift

Workload evidence is from In person reviews only.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

He is described as knowledgeable and kind by one student, but others call the .

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely In person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

, and a 20-page paper, with exams carrying major weight.

Format shift

Assessment evidence comes from In person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person reviews are mixed, with one very positive student and several , and organization.

Main concern

Lectures may not prepare students well for quizzes and tests.

What students said

“The lectures he gives have nothing to do with the .”
BIO30
“ and the so make sure to study both.”
BIO30
“Only good thing about his class is he offers .”
BIO30

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and quiz formats based on vocab and PowerPoints, with no clear proctoring or open-book policy.

Vocab And PowerPoint TestsQuiz Based AssessmentFinal Paper

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews mention tests, quizzes, and a but do not clearly prove open-book rules, closed-book rules, or proctoring.

Vocab And PowerPoint TestsKahoot Quizzes For Points20 Page Paper
“ and the so make sure to study both.”
BIO30
“Doesn't always take attendance but .”
BIO30
“He assigns a 20 page paper at the end of the semester, but its not hard.”
BIO30

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor was nice although his teaching was terrible.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“This professor was nice although his teaching was terrible.”

📚 Assessment Fit

80/100

“ and the so make sure to study both.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

35/100

“Would not reccommend at all.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I really like Professor Ignacio, he is very knwoledgable and always makes sure we understand the class.
  • The .
  • He reads straight from the powerpoints, I can do at home.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Only good thing about his class is he offers .
  • , and he offers if you do ALL the flashcards.
  • and the so make sure to study both.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Four in person reviews give useful but mixed evidence across several years, with and teaching clarity.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

BIO304 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values