AI Rate Professor

Guidance

Jeff Moser

GUID3 · GUIDANCE3 · GUIDANCE · GUDI3 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you can handle long lectures and start the packet early, but if you need a lively class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCareer Guidance FocusedLecture HeavyPacket WorkMixed Teaching ReviewsMostly Manageable
  • Students are and finding the class boring or disorganized.
  • The class is usually not conceptually hard, but the large packet can punish procrastination.
  • explicitly saying there are no tests.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

An A is possible through completing assignments, but the end-loaded packet and .

Online evidence is limited but positive, while if started early.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

63/100

The guidance content is not difficult, but long lectures and a large packet make the experience less effortless.

Online evidence suggests useful beginner guidance, while and packet workload.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

because points and assignments may happen in class, but the evidence does not prove a strict universal policy.

The online review does not address attendance, while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Students recommend him when they value career guidance, but repeated boredom and workload complaints make the recommendation conditional.

The only online review is positive, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

, but and resumes are graded with little leniency.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions clear grading and feedback, while and stricter paper grading.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The class is not hard, but the large packet and end-of-semester deadline create workload pressure for procrastinators.

Format shift

Online workload evidence is thin, while .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Some students find him helpful and meaningful, while others describe him as boring, absent, or awful.

Format shift

Online evidence is positive but only one review, while and less stable.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews emphasize packets, in-class assignments, papers, resumes, and no tests rather than exams.

Format shift

Online evidence does not describe assessments in detail, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

guidance but complaints about long lectures, packet work, and occasional poor organization.

Main concern

The main concern is boring lectures and a large packet due near the end of the semester.

What students said

“He is overall a chill professor.”
GUIDANCE3
“its a lot of work.”
GUID3
“ EVER!!!!!!!!”
GUID3

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review says the class helped clarify degree goals and was useful.

Main concern

Only , so online evidence is limited.

What students said

“This class helped me by providing an idea of what degree I want to focus on.”
GUIDANCE3

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The clearest evidence says there are no tests, so , though not every review confirms the policy.

No TestsAssignment-Based GradingPacket Work

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but reviews do not clearly prove other exam policy details.

No TestsIn-Class Assignments
“No tests.”
GUID3
“Class is not hard if you show up (lots of in class ).”
GUID3

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam, quiz, webcam, proctoring, open-book, or Lockdown Browser rules.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“COMPLETE all the assignments and you will pass :)”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, assessment, and format differences; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Prof. Moser likes to talk a lot so be prepared to listen to him talk the whole time.”

📦 Workload Pattern

48/100

“he gives plenty of time to do it but if you are a procrastinator, you probably wont finish it on time”

👍 Recommendation Value

68/100

“This class will definitely help people who are in a similar situation.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is overall a chill professor.
  • Mr. Moser is one of the coolest teachers I've had!
  • hes really boring too

Theme 2

📦 About Work and Grades

  • the work he gives is not hard but there is a big packet he makes you do but not due until end of semester.
  • its a lot of work.
  • At first it seems like an easy A but when it comes time and resumes, he grades them with little leniancy.

Theme 3

🧭 About Usefulness

  • This class helped me by providing an idea of what degree I want to focus on.
  • The class shows you how to become more efficient and productive in life.
  • Interesting class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only 12 reviews over a long period, with one online review and highly mixed detail quality.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

GUID37 reviews
GUIDANCE33 reviews
GUDI31 review
GUIDANCE1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1