AI Rate Professor

American Sign Language

Stacey de Laune

ASL849 · ASL1 · ASL2 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
58.33%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want an engaging ASL teacher, but be cautious online due to communication and module issues.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerGreat in personPoor online communicationParticipation mattersCaring but demandingHeavy assignments
  • In-person students often praise her as fun, patient, and clear.
  • Online reviews are sharply mixed because communication problems hurt the experience.
  • Participation and because ASL skill builds through class practice.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

Grades can be fair or easy, but students must participate, attend, and keep up with assignments.

Online reviews mention easy grading but workload spikes, while and practice.

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

ASL is not conceptually effortless because communication, participation, and cultural expectations matter throughout the course.

Online students face technical and communication barriers, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

because reviews say in-person learning and participation are central to success.

; online reviews focus more on communication and assignments.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

, but online students report enough problems to make the choice format-dependent.

, while online sentiment is sharply divided.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Several students say she grades easily or fairly, but effort and participation still matter.

Format shift

Online reviews mention easy grading most clearly, while .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Workload can be demanding, especially online weeks with many assignments and .

Format shift

Online reviews report assignment overload, while and tests.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

She can be excellent and engaging in person, but poor communication creates major negative experiences.

Format shift

In-person teaching is usually praised, while online teaching support is inconsistent.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention tests, participation, assignments, rubrics, and practice .

Format shift

Online evidence leans assignment-heavy, while and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students mostly describe her as engaging, patient, and helpful, though .

Main concern

Students who struggle with in-class signing or .

What students said

“She is very knowledgeable and helpful and patient.”
ASL2
“ .”
ASL1

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews and serious communication problems.

Main concern

Students report slow or and module problems.

What students said

“This professor was extremely hard to communicate with!”
ASL1
“she grades fairly easily, especially considering many of us are first time ASL students.”
ASL1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests but do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or Lockdown Browser.

Test HeavyReviews do not clearly prove proctoring policy

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and reviews, but do not clearly prove exam rules or book policy.

Test HeavyTest Reviews
“She'll show you her rubrics, reviews for the test, etc.”
ASL1
“ .”
ASL1

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, or open-book policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you want an engaging ASL teacher, but be cautious online due to communication and module issues.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, communication, workload, and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“She is very knowledgeable and helpful and patient.”

📬 Communication Risk

42/100

“This professor was extremely hard to communicate with!”

📈 Grade Effort

64/100

“she grades fairly easily, especially considering many of us are first time ASL students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very knowledgeable and helpful and patient.
  • She acts out things so that it's easy for you to understand.
  • Creates a great learning environment for everyone.

Theme 2

📬 About Communication

  • Had sent multiple emails and never got a response until I emailed the head of the department.
  • What very little communication we would receive would be some form of excuse.

Theme 3

📚 About Effort

  • .
  • there have been a few weeks with more than 8 assignments due.
  • Participation matters

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews with consistent format-specific patterns provide strong evidence, despite polarized experiences.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ASL110 reviews
ASL21 review
ASL8491 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values