AI Rate Professor

English

Rachel Meenan

ENGL1B · ENGL1A · ENG475 · 1B · ENGL96003 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take her if and can handle writing volume, but if you need tight structure every class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging but inconsistentHeavy writing workloadGood feedbackLenient when communicatingRisky online workload
  • Positive students find her fun, caring, and .
  • Negative students report rambling, poor organization, or very little instruction.
  • Online ENGL1B looks especially workload-heavy and strict compared with many in-person reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is possible with communication, participation, and completed essays, but the writing workload can be heavy and late work can hurt.

and , while online evidence shows stricter rules and heavier work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The course is conceptually manageable but , and organization issues add real difficulty.

Online ENGL1B appears more demanding, while in-person ENGL1A is often described as fun and easier.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance and participation matter because freewrites are for credit, though she may accept communication about absences.

, while in-person reviews mention participation, freewrites, and some flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

Students split sharply between loving her engaging style and warning about disorganization or wasted class time.

In-person recommendations are mixed but often positive, while online comments are more workload-focused and negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

64/100

She can be flexible and , but and heavy writing keep grading from feeling easy for everyone.

Format shift

and late acceptance, while online reviews stress strict rules and .

Workload

Heavy

26/100

Many , and frequent writing tasks.

Format shift

Online workload is clearly heavy, while of homework depending on course.

Teaching experience

Average

64/100

Her teaching can be engaging and supportive, but multiple students report weak instruction, rambling, and poor organization.

Format shift

In-person reviews are polarized, while online reviews focus more on workload and organization than live teaching.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grades appear driven mostly by essays, outlines, freewrites, reading logs, and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize papers and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with many students praising fun topics and feedback while others report poor instruction or disorganization.

Main concern

Some students feel class time is wasted or instruction is too loose.

What students said

“ assignment, so you will never be lost.”
ENGL1A
“Very little actual instruction was done throughout the year.”
ENGL1B

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and a very heavy paper and module workload.

Main concern

The online workload can feel excessive and time-consuming.

What students said

“Also an , AND source evaluation for every essay (which is every week) on top of useless module logs is a straight waste of time.”
ENGL1B
“The and while to do.”
ENGL1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exams or proctoring, and assessment appears mostly essay and .

Paper-Based AssessmentNo Clear Exam EvidenceNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and peer review, but do not clearly prove any exam policy or proctoring rules.

EssaysFreewritesPeer Review
“ ”
ENGL1A
“We usually have a , and 4 essays.”
ENG475

Online

Online reviews mention essays, outlines, source evaluations, module logs, and homework, but do not clearly prove exams, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Paper-Based AssessmentNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Also an , AND source evaluation for every essay”
ENGL1B
“The and while to do.”
ENGL1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ assignment, so you will never be lost.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

64/100

“Very little actual instruction was done throughout the year.”

📚 Workload Pressure

26/100

“The and while to do.”

👍 Recommendation Split

56/100

“I .”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes learning fun and enjoyable as she understands that English can sometimes get boring.
  • Very little actual instruction was done throughout the year.
  • She makes the class fun and easy to understand.

Theme 2

📝 About Workload

  • Also an , AND source evaluation for every essay
  • We usually have a , and 4 essays.
  • There's a ton of freewrites and theyre for credit so be there

Theme 3

📈 About Grades and Flexibility

  • She's amazing, not strict at all.
  • She is easy about grading, if you have difficulties in know.
  • She is very strict about following the rules of the assignment.

Theme 4

⚠️ About Organization Concerns

  • Everything from there was a disaster, the dean, sub and teacher never .
  • she constantly forgot the material at home for the day and blamed on pregnancy brain.
  • The vast majority of class time was spent with .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen recent and detailed reviews provide strong evidence, though opinions are sharply divided by course and format.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENGL1A5 reviews
ENGL1B4 reviews
1B2 reviews
ENG4752 reviews
ENGL960031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 4 · A 2

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2