AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Christina Mcpeck

CDE1 · CDE2 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
87/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

class, but be ready for attendance expectations and possible grading delays.

Best fit · Easy A HunterVery easy gradingCaring and accessibleMandatory attendance concernsSlow gradingLow workload
  • Most students describe her classes as easy, caring, and .
  • One strong negative review criticizes mandatory , and .
  • Students who attend, participate, and pressure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

94/100

Multiple students earned A-range grades with generous deadlines, easy grading, full credit flexibility, and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

The course content sounds low-pressure, with videos, group activities, handouts, and assignments that students describe as manageable.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Reviews say attending helps and one student .

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most students recommend her for support and , but one review strongly regrets taking her due to weak lectures and .

Recommendation evidence is only in person, with three positive reviews and one sharply negative review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

95/100

Students report A grades, and skipping a final while still earning 98.

Format shift

because there are no online reviews.

Workload

Light

82/100

Assignments have long deadlines and the class uses videos, group activities, quizzes, and handouts rather than intense workload.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

She is often described as , and chill, but one review says lectures were useless and she barely taught.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in person, and it is mostly positive with one severe negative outlier.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Reviews emphasize assignments, quizzes, handouts, presentations, participation, and the possibility of not taking a final.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews mostly describe an easy and supportive class with , and accessible help, though one student found lectures and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“I and ended with a 98 still!”
CDE1
“She barely teaches, but .”
CDE2
“no questions asked and she still gives you full credit.”
CDE1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is student-friendly because and another says quizzes came from handouts, but broader exam rules are not clearly proven.

Final Waived In One ClassQuizzes From HandoutsExam Policy Not Fully Proven

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes based on handouts, but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, midterm, or final policy overall.

Final Waived In One ClassQuizzes From Handouts
“I and ended with a 98 still!”
CDE1
“Make sure to .”
CDE2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I and ended with a 98 still!”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, , and teaching concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Easy A Potential

94/100

“I and ended with a 98 still!”

❤️ Support & Access

74/100

“gives you her personal number to contact outside of class basically at any time just not super late of course!”

⚠️

18/100

“She barely teaches, but .”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • no questions asked and she still gives you full credit.
  • You have WEEKS until an

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very informative and is very chill.
  • Lectures on campus from her are useless & redundant.
  • No teaching from her for 4+ weeks while we did presentations that were irrelevant to class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • gives you her personal number to contact outside of class basically at any time just not super late of course!
  • she's the best.
  • Accessible outside class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Four in-person reviews give useful but limited evidence, with and one strong negative teaching report.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CDE12 reviews
CDE22 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values