AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Mario Vargas

CHEM · CHEM10 · CHEM1078749 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you can teach yourself chemistry and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesHarsh GradingPoor PreparationSelf-Teaching RequiredAvoided by Students
  • and assumes prior chemistry knowledge.
  • Intro chemistry is described as much harder than expected, especially for students weak in math.
  • Reviews report harsh grading, failing, dropping, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Getting an A appears very unlikely because students report failing, dropping, and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

The course is described as intro chemistry taught as if students already know the material, with math demands that make it feel much harder.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly describe an , so flexibility cannot be confirmed.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, and those reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

2/100

Students overwhelmingly say not to take him because , and many struggle to pass.

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Students explicitly report harsh grading and several reviews mention failing or dropping.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Workload is not deeply detailed, but and while comments emphasize high struggle.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Every review gives the lowest quality rating and describes unclear explanations, poor preparation, or inability to teach.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Reviews mention tests, pop quizzes, papers, and grading, but do not provide a .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are uniformly negative, citing , poor preparation, harsh grading, and high failure risk.

Main concern

Students feel they must teach themselves while .

What students said

“Does .”
CHEM
“He does not prepare you for tests and .”
CHEM1078749
“he also grades harsh too.”
CHEM10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students say he does not prepare them for tests and uses pop quizzes, but .

Tests Not Well Prepared ForPop QuizzesHigh Difficulty

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and pop quizzes but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, or .

TestsPop Quizzes
“He does not prepare you for tests and .”
CHEM1078749
“Beware of pop quizzes”
CHEM

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“Does .”

⚠️ Course Difficulty

12/100

“He made this intro to Chem harder than it really is.”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

2/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He expects us to know everything on the spot and teach ourselves, when the TEACHER should TEACH us students who need to learn.
  • He teaches as if you already have a chemistry background but this is intro to chem.
  • lame cannot relay info accurately.

Theme 2

📉 About Grades And Passing

  • he also grades harsh too.
  • Most students like myself are either failing or dropping the .
  • I really need this class but because ill fail with this teacher for sure.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Six detailed reviews are consistent but mostly old, so the pattern is credible with some time-based caution.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CHEM103 reviews
CHEM2 reviews
CHEM10787491 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1