AI Rate Professor

Radiological Sciences

Kristin Beinschroth

RT472 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Consider her only if you can commit steady study time and clarify participation or office-hour expectations early.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarized ReviewsExtra CreditAttendance DisputeHelpful When EngagedTime Commitment Required
  • One in-person student describes her as excellent, helpful, and fair with non-tricky exams.
  • One online student reports a serious issue with .
  • Success appears tied , and using help hours.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A seems possible with , and , but the online review suggests participation penalties can hurt grades.

In-person evidence suggests fair effort is rewarded, while online evidence warns that .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Radiology theory appears content-heavy and requires dedicated review outside class even when exams are fair.

In-person evidence describes manageable but time-intensive material, while online evidence reports high difficulty without much content detail.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

Office hours were described as not mandatory, but , so flexibility is questionable.

Online evidence raises the attendance concern, while the rules.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Reviews are split between perfection and a major grading-policy complaint, making the recommendation highly dependent on format and expectations.

The , while the online review is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

and non-tricky exams help, but one review reports .

Format shift

, while online grading sounds stricter due to participation penalties.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students should expect assignments and significant independent review time.

Format shift

and assignments, while online evidence implies effort through office-hour expectations.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Teaching evidence is sharply split between amazing lectures and a severe online policy complaint.

Format shift

In-person evidence is excellent, while online evidence is poor and focused on fairness rather than lecture quality.

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

, and , but no full grading breakdown is given.

Format shift

, and , while online evidence centers on office-hour points.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The only in-person review is highly , and support.

Main concern

Students still need to spend time reviewing material and completing assignments.

What students said

“ .”
RT472
“She will help you succeed.”
RT472

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is very negative and as not mandatory.

Main concern

.

What students said

“ !!!”
RT472

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The no proof of proctoring, open-book rules, Lockdown Browser, or final format.

Non-Tricky ExamsAssignmentsExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The but does not clearly prove open-book rules, closed-book rules, proctoring, or .

Non-Tricky Exams
“ .”
RT472

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I dont know where to start. PERFECTION!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“I dont know where to start. PERFECTION!”

⚖️

50/100

“ !!!”

📚 Effort Required

55/100

“dont expect to pass if you are not willing to dedicate your time in reviewing her material in your own time and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She will help you succeed.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Expectations

  • Make use of her meeting hours and
  • But at the end of the !!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews exist, split completely by format and tone, so confidence is limited.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

RT4722 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1