AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Michelle Martinez

GUID2 · PSYCH1 · PHYSC25 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
44.44%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you value a reflective, success-focused class and can manage deadlines without relying on quick online communication.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but inconsistentUnclear online criteriaParticipation mattersStrict late workPurposeful assignments
  • Positive reviews describe her as caring and focused on student success.
  • Online reviews raise repeated concerns about unclear criteria, slow communication, changing due dates, and no late-work flexibility.
  • The class is not intellectually hard for everyone, but students must keep up with , and assignment rules.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

A good grade is possible with steady completion, but strict late work, few graded items, participation, and .

Online reviews make the A feel more fragile due to strict deadlines and , while but support is stronger.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The content is not usually described as hard, but reading, reflection, participation, and .

Online students call the class easy but , while as meaningful but not easy.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters in several reviews, but the comments do not clearly prove a .

Online reviews emphasize discussion participation, while in-person .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Students who , but online students often do not because of communication and organization problems.

, while online reviews are mostly hesitant or negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

46/100

Grades seem achievable, but strict late-work , and unclear criteria reduce leniency.

Format shift

because of no late work and unclear criteria, while as work-for-the-grade.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The workload , and reflective assignments, with mixed views on intensity.

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussion posts, replies, reading, and homework, while and meaningful effort.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

She is caring and intentional for some students, but online organization, communication, and .

Format shift

, while online reviews repeatedly criticize communication and course setup.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment is mostly assignment, discussion, homework, and paper based, with .

Format shift

Online evidence centers on discussions and assignments, while and one test complaint.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

style, but students still say the class requires work and can have difficult tests or readings.

Main concern

It is not an automatic easy A and may require steady effort.

What students said

“Mrs. Martinez really wants you to be successful, not only in this class, but in life.”
GUID2
“This class is not an easy A though, she definitely makes you work for it and think about your future.”
GUID2

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly critical of , and strict late-work rules despite some easy content.

Main concern

Online students may struggle with and poor communication.

What students said

“Professor rarely replied to emails.”
GUID2
“Her class was easy but I really wish I hadn't taken an online class because ”
GUID2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and mixed, with and online reviews focused more on assignments than exams.

First Test MentionedDiscussion-Based Online WorkFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Psych 1, but do not clearly prove broader exam format or proctoring details.

First Test Mentioned
“When the entire class bombs the first test and you as a teacher announce "The psychology class (Psych 1), you're doing something wrong as a teacher.”
PSYCH1

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, .

Discussion-Based WorkFew Graded Items
“A class composed of 1day and complete replies 4 days later.”
GUID2
“Aren't many things to grade in this class, so make sure you turn in EVERYthing and you'll be alright?”
GUID2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She really wants you to be successful in college.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in support, online organization, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️ Student Support

58/100

“She really wants you to be successful in college.”

⚠️ Online Organization

35/100

“Criteria for and dates for assignments constantly changed without notification from the professor.”

📈 Grade Effort

55/100

“This class is not an easy A though, she definitely makes you work for it and think about your future.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Support

  • She genuinely cares about her students and .
  • and you will be fine.
  • Prof.Martinez and this class is not what you think.

Theme 2

💻 About Online Experience

  • Professor rarely replied to emails.
  • The syllabus was an awkward slideshow posted after the first day of class.
  • Her class was easy but I really wish I hadn't taken an online class because

Theme 3

📚 About Work and Grading

  • .
  • Aren't many things to grade in this class, so make sure you turn in EVERYthing and you'll be alright?
  • This class is not an easy A though, she definitely makes you work for it and think about your future.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

61/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because only 9 reviews are available, but online and differences.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 50

Course coverage

GUID27 reviews
PHYSC251 review
PSYCH11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1