AI Rate Professor

History

Francisco Najera

HIST12 · HIST18 · HIST71 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you can work independently without timely grades or feedback.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDelayed GradingLight DiscussionsShort EssaysUnderstandingHard To Reach
  • The online workload is usually light, but .
  • Students report short discussions and a .
  • Recommendation is split because helpfulness and leniency are offset by poor responsiveness.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Getting an A seems possible with steady completion of discussions and essays, but .

All evidence comes from online reviews; there is no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course content sounds manageable, with short discussions, chapter work, and a .

All course-easiness evidence is from online sections only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

One review warns that skipping class may hurt performance, but the online structure is mostly module and deadline based.

Only online reviews mention attendance or participation expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Students are divided because the work can be reasonable, but and weak communication create real frustration.

Recommendation evidence is entirely online, with no in-person comparison.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Grades can be favorable when work is completed, but the .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Workload is mostly weekly discussions and a few essays, though fast-track pacing can make deadlines feel tight.

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from online fast-track or online course reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Students appreciate clarity and kindness at times, but poor responsiveness and .

Format shift

Teaching evidence is online only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews describe discussions and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe light weekly work and some understanding, but and poor communication.

Main concern

Grades and .

What students said

“he has only graded 1 thing in 8 weeks now”
HIST18
“Super light and reasonable on work, not a ton of papers and .”
HIST12

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove any exam .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Super light and reasonable on work, not a ton of papers and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“ and .”

⚠️

35/100

“ the semester”

📚 Workload

62/100

“Easy to understand syllabus with a chapter.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and .
  • This course was one of the better fast tracks (8 wks) I have taken.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the work you put in is the grade you get
  • he has only graded 1 thing in 8 weeks now

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Super light and reasonable on work, not a ton of papers and .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Four detailed online reviews show consistent themes, but there is and opinions are split.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HIST122 reviews
HIST181 review
HIST711 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2