AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Keith Montgomery

HS30 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you need flexibility, but be aware that one student reported a serious negative interaction.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFlexible deadlinesSchedule friendlyMixed communicationFew graded itemsPolarizing experience
  • Two reviews describe Montgomery as flexible and helpful for busy students.
  • One online review reports a severe communication and professionalism problem.
  • The class can be easy and schedule-friendly, but the experience depends heavily on communication fit.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

The class seems easy when communication goes well because students mention few graded items, missed work recovery, and schedule flexibility.

Online evidence includes both easy-class praise and a harsh negative review, while the .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The content appears manageable and schedule-friendly, with no comments describing hard concepts.

Both formats suggest manageable difficulty, but online comments are more conflicted about the instructor experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

82/100

Students say he works around missed assignments, tests, and discussions, but .

Both formats support flexibility around missed work, though the online evidence is mixed overall.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

62/100

Recommendation is mixed because while one warns against taking the class.

The in-person review recommends him, while online reviews are split between strong praise and strong criticism.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students report and is graded by few things.

Format shift

Both online and graded items.

Workload

Light

80/100

The course is described as easy and manageable for full-time workers and students.

Format shift

Online and in-person evidence both support a light, schedule-friendly workload.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

about communication, aggression, and professionalism.

Format shift

The in-person review is positive, while online reviews are polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Reviews mention tests, discussions, assignments, participation, and few graded items without enough .

Format shift

Online reviews mention tests and discussions, while the and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The student schedule and helps recover missed points.

Main concern

.

What students said

“this professor really works around you”
HS30
“Take this class!”
HS30

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are sharply split between a very flexible easy class and a negative communication experience.

Main concern

Online communication and professionalism may be inconsistent.

What students said

“this professor makes life easy”
HS30
“Unprofessional and lack of communication.”
HS30
“Save your money!”
HS30

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

One online review says missed tests can be worked around, but reviews .

Missed Test FlexibilityReviews do not clearly prove proctoring policy

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, quizzes, midterms, or final exam policy.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Online

Online reviews mention a missed test can be worked around, but do not clearly prove .

Missed Test FlexibilityReviews do not clearly prove proctoring policy
“if you accidentally missed a it”
HS30

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want a easy class and need something to .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

👍 Flexibility

82/100

“this professor really works around you”

📈 Easy Class

78/100

“If you want a easy class and need something to .”

⚠️ Communication Risk

58/100

“Unprofessional and lack of communication.”

Theme 1

🕒 About Flexibility

  • this professor really works around you
  • this professor will work around it and help you gain the .
  • Take this class!

Theme 2

⚠️ About Communication

  • Unprofessional and lack of communication.
  • I dropped this class because he did not want to be wrong
  • Save your money!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

, and the comments are strongly inconsistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HS303 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values