AI Rate Professor

Nutrition Foods

Andrea Fitzgerald

NF15 · NF5 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
63/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
72.73%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if and keep up with steady work, especially online.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of workKnowledgeableParticipation mattersSlow grading onlineClear if engaged
  • Fitzgerald is generally viewed as knowledgeable and solid, especially in person.
  • The course content is usually manageable, but students repeatedly mention lots of work and reading.
  • Online reviews raise , and strict late-work rules.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

An A is realistic if students keep up with , and participate, but and late-work rules add risk.

Online reviews describe more workload and stricter assignment tracking, while participation and study.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The content is usually described as easy or manageable, though nutrition depth, reading, and fast lectures can raise the challenge.

Online students call the work mostly doable but heavy, while as easy if they pay attention.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Online reviews say there are no mandatory Zoom meetings, while and class engagement matter.

Online attendance appears flexible, but .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

because she is knowledgeable and fair enough, though online organization and grading delays frustrate some students.

In-person reviews are more consistently positive, while online reviews are and assignment visibility issues.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

54/100

Grading seems fair in person, but , and no late-work exceptions.

Format shift

Online grading is stricter and slower, while as good or helped by and participation.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Several reviews describe lots of work, reading, quizzes, exams, papers, class activities, and participation tasks.

Format shift

Online reviews most strongly emphasize heavy workload, while as manageable but steady.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Students usually call her knowledgeable and useful, but some criticize monotone delivery, fast pacing, and online response delays.

Format shift

, while because of delayed grading and communication.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Assessment includes quizzes, exams, papers, essays, presentations, activities, and participation rather than one dominant method.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, exams, papers, essays, and activities, while in-person , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

or useful class with textbook study, participation, papers, quizzes, and exams.

Main concern

Some students find her monotone or fast in lecture, and participation can affect borderline grades.

What students said

“She was a nice easygoing teacher.”
NF5
“The class was easy enough.”
NF5
“Overall easy class if you pay attention.”
NF5

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews say the class is doable but work-heavy, with , and no late-work exceptions.

Main concern

Students must monitor assignments closely because some work may not be obvious in the modules.

What students said

“There's a LOT of work in this class, but she gives a week to finish it.”
NF5
“CHECK THE ASSIGNMENT SECTION.”
NF5
“there are NO EXCEPTIONS.”
NF5

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and exams that are manageable with textbook study, but policies are not described in detail.

QuizzesExamsTextbook StudyPop Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and pop quizzes, but do not clearly prove book rules or proctoring policy.

Textbook-Based TestsPop QuizzesPresentation
“ as long as you studied the textbook and payed attention.”
NF5
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”
NF15

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and exams but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

QuizzesExams
“Just mostly quizzes, exams, 2 summary papers, 1 essay, and class activities regarding nutrition labels.”
NF5

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class was easy especially when I took the NF5 Nutrition for Life class online during the pandemic. It just has a lot of work, but it's doable. Just do the work and you'll do great.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Workload Reality

35/100

“There's a LOT of work in this class, but she gives a week to finish it.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“Very knowledgeable and a .”

⚖️

54/100

“Takes forever to grade stuff. .”

Theme 1

📌 About Online Organization

  • Keep an because she won't mention some.
  • CHECK THE ASSIGNMENT SECTION.
  • don't bother asking if you can turn in late work there are NO EXCEPTIONS.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Work

  • It just has a lot of work, but it's doable.
  • Overall easy class if you pay attention.
  • Just read the textbook and you'll and exams.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her class was great I learned a lot.
  • Her way of speaking when teaching students is very monotonic, which makes students get bored really fast.
  • Very knowledgeable and a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 11 reviews give useful detail, but the sample is smaller and split across online and in-person formats.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NF58 reviews
NF153 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values