AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Fanta Gelenchi

MATH520 · MATH510 · BUS60 · MATH425 · MATH25 · MATH420 · MATH0964339 · MATH25N · MATH090 · MATH605 · MATH31 · MATH410 · MATH401 · 41 lifetime ratings

AI rating
67/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
77.78%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you can learn from written notes, attend consistently, and prepare for .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful notesStrong accentTest-heavy gradingMultiple-choice testsAttendance matters
  • Students repeatedly , and .
  • The and lecture style, which some students find very hard.
  • Grades often depend on quizzes and than collection.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

An A is realistic for students who attend, study notes, and practice, but the A.

and multiple-choice tests, while the single online review reports more homework and less support.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Many students call the class easy when they follow notes, but math weakness and lecture comprehension can make it hard.

, while the online review presents the course as harder and more self-directed.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

because students say skipping class makes passing difficult or leaves them lost.

In-person reviews strongly support attendance dependence, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and caring help, but communication barriers keep the recommendation from being universal.

but divided by accent issues, while the online review is only mildly positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

He , and does not always collect homework.

Format shift

Leniency is strongly supported by in-person reviews, while as clear.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

, but quizzes and tests still require steady preparation.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions lots of homework, while .

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

He is caring and organized for many students, but a recurring accent and clarity problem seriously affects others.

Format shift

In-person evidence is highly mixed, and the single online review describes limited live teaching.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Grades are repeatedly described as based mainly on quizzes, chapter tests, and .

Format shift

, while online assessment details are unclear beyond homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

he gives detailed notes and help, while his accent and .

Main concern

because many students mention a strong accent.

What students said

“TAKES TIME TO BREAK DOWN CONCEPTS.”
MATH510
“Your grade will depend on the tests and quizzes.”
MATH425
“The guy is super hard to understand.”
MATH420

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review describes a PowerPoint-based class with no Zoom meetings, lots of homework, and limited help.

Main concern

Students may need and notes.

What students said

“No zoom meetings!”
MATH401
“Kinda rude when asking for help too.”
MATH401
“Lots of homework”
MATH401

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear mostly standard and test-heavy, but multiple-choice formats and dropped scores make them more manageable.

Multiple-Choice TestsQuizzesDropped Lowest Test Or Quiz

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews often mention multiple-choice tests, quizzes, finals, and dropped low scores, with .

Multiple-Choice TestsQuizzesFinal ExamDropped Lowest Test Or Quiz
“All of his tests and .”
MATH090
“ AND !!!”
MATH520
“Your grade will depend on the tests and quizzes.”
MATH425

Online

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He gives step by step instructions on his lessons.”

Voice snapshots generated from 41 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“He gives step by step instructions on his lessons.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

72/100

“ !”

🧪 Assessment Style

88/100

“Your grade will depend on the tests and quizzes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • TAKES TIME TO BREAK DOWN CONCEPTS.
  • He writes everything down step by step, and .
  • His , and informative.

Theme 2

🗣️ About Clarity

  • He does have a slight language barrier and can be intimidating
  • You cannot understand anything that he says
  • The only bad thing is getting past his accent.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and .
  • .
  • Your and quizzes only so you want to make sure you do well on those.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

41

Recent reviews read by the AI

41

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-one reviews across many years give a consistent , and .

Inside 41 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 518
3 out of 58
2 out of 56
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH41010 reviews
MATH4208 reviews
MATH4255 reviews
MATH5204 reviews
MATH253 reviews
Show 9 more courses
MATH5103 reviews
4201 review
BUS601 review
MATH0901 review
MATH09643391 review
MATH25N1 review
MATH311 review
MATH4011 review
MATH6051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2