AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ernesto Reyes

MATH41025 · MATH35 · MATH25 · MATH420 · MATH410 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you can handle a polarizing teaching style, lots of homework, and learning math through persistence.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizingLots of HomeworkUnclear LecturesHelpful When EngagedTough Grader
  • Reviews are highly polarized, with some students calling him great and .
  • The , and moving too fast for confused students.
  • Workload is often heavy, and getting an A appears possible only with real effort and math readiness.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly mention lots of , and that it is not an easy A.

All because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Math content becomes harder because students report technical lectures, unclear explanations, board mistakes, and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, but success appears to require active engagement and asking for help.

and comes only from in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Some students strongly recommend him for learning, while many others warn that and frustrating.

All , and it is strongly conflicting.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

, and comments about not being an easy A .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Multiple students explicitly mention lots of homework and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Teaching quality is polarized, with some praising his help and , and ineffective.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in person, with no online comparison available.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Comments emphasize homework heavily, while .

Format shift

Assessment evidence comes only from in-person reviews and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

from very helpful and fun to confusing, mistake-prone, and frustrating.

Main concern

Many students report , and .

What students said

“ !”
MATH420
“Not an easy A, but if you are looking to learn the dreaded subject of .”
MATH41025

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, Lockdown Browser, midterm, final, or quiz policies.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not an easy A, but if you are looking to learn the dreaded subject of .”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and recommendation split. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“His students can't rely on him to TEACH anything.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“He does give a lot of homework, but will always work with you to help you understand it.”

👍 Recommendation Split

45/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Can get unnecessarily technical during lecture.
  • His lecture style didn't help me learn.
  • breaks down math so anyone can understand.
  • Most of the work he does on the board is incorrect

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Not an easy A, but if you are looking to learn the dreaded subject of .
  • He does give a lot of homework, but will always work with you to help you understand it.
  • I felt that

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • !
  • .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews across many years provide rich detail, though opinions are polarized and several reviews are old.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH4104 reviews
MATH4203 reviews
MATH252 reviews
MATH410252 reviews
MATH351 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values