AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Cindy Esquivel Corado

CDE24 · CDE2 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
1.3

The decision

if you prioritize an easy grade, but and reliability issues.

Best fit · Easy A HunterVery easy ACaringDisorganized in personGroup presentationsMixed reliability
  • All reported grades are A+, so the course appears very easy to pass with a high grade.
  • Teaching quality is split between two very positive reviews and one severe in-person complaint about lateness, missed class, and poor structure.
  • The small review count makes the profile useful but not highly stable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

96/100

Every reported student earned an A+, and comments .

Both online and , though the evidence base is only three reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

90/100

The course appears intellectually light, with very low difficulty ratings and simple group or class activity work.

Online evidence is too brief but positive, while in-person evidence suggests easy activities despite organization concerns.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

One in-person review says she expects students on time despite arriving late, while other reviews .

Online , while in-person evidence raises punctuality and class-time concerns.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

67/100

Students are split because , but one detailed negative review warns about poor structure and lateness.

The online review is positive, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

96/100

All three reported grades are A+, and .

Format shift

Both formats show A+ outcomes, but the sample is very small.

Workload

Featherlight

92/100

, and in-class activities rather than heavy workload.

Format shift

Online workload is unclear but easy, while .

Teaching experience

Average

66/100

Her teaching is described as caring and engaging by some students, but , and poor structure.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is positive but based on one review, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The only clear assessment evidence is weekly group PowerPoint presentations and class activities, with .

Format shift

Online assessment details are not clear, while and activities.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

work and activities and one criticizing lateness, missed classes, and poor structure.

Main concern

Reliability and structure may vary significantly by class or term.

What students said

“Has no structure and talks off subject often.”
CDE24
“Awesome in class activities. I enjoyed the class.”
CDE2

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review is very positive and describes her as helpful, caring, and willing to fix problems.

Main concern

There is only one online review, so confidence is limited.

What students said

“she is so helpful and if you have a problem with anything she will work to fix it”
CDE24

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the , or final format.

No Clear Exam Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but one review mentions weekly group PowerPoint presentations.

Group Presentations
“each week your group presents a PowerPoint on the assign chapter.”
CDE2

Online

Reviews do not clearly prove the online exam format, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Nice, understanding but needs to work on arriving to class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting easy grading, support, organization, and reliability concerns; credibility rating: Low.

📈 Easy Grade

96/100

“Awesome professor. You get assign to a group the first week of class and each week your group presents a PowerPoint on the assign chapter.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

66/100

“She is such an amazing professor she is so helpful”

⚠️ Organization Risk

45/100

“Has no structure and talks off subject often.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Support

  • She is such an amazing professor she is so helpful
  • Nice, understanding but needs to work on arriving to class.

Theme 2

📚 About Class Structure

  • each week your group presents a PowerPoint on the assign chapter.
  • Awesome in class activities.
  • Changes up the syllabus last minute.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Reliability

  • Is always late and will message ETA & is never accurate but expects you in & on time.
  • Misses class often.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews exist, with a large conflict between positive and negative in-person experiences.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CDE242 reviews
CDE21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values