AI Rate Professor

English

Terry Steagall

ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENGLISH1A · ENG20232 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you can handle disorganization and heavy writing work for a potentially supportive beginner writing class.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyDisorganizedHeavy writing workloadTough gradingMixed feedbackBeginner-friendly for some
  • Students are sharply split, with two very positive reviews and four negative ones.
  • Negative reviews repeatedly cite , and weak feedback.
  • The course can help beginner writers, but and a lot of writing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A appears possible, but many students , and heavy weekly work.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The writing content is not necessarily advanced, but and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Students say participation and showing up matter, and one review warns that skipping class hurts passing chances.

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is low because most detailed , and grading problems.

All because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Several students describe tough or opinion-based grading and forgotten .

Format shift

because there are no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Multiple tags and comments mention , and weekly work.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Positive reviews praise her for beginners, but most , and weak feedback.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

The course , and writing assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

but lean negative because , and organization create frustration.

Main concern

The , and inconsistent grading.

What students said

“A lot of the ”
ENG1A
“She is very indecisive on what she wants students to do.”
ENGL1A
“Definitely a great teacher if you're a beginner writer!”
ENGLISH1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention pop quizzes but do not clearly prove exam .

Pop Quizzes MentionedExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove the full exam policy or .

Pop Quizzes Mentioned
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”
ENG1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's a nice teacher but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“She's a nice teacher but .”

⚖️

25/100

“She grades based on opinion and not academically.”

📝 Workload

24/100

“There is , but all of it will help you learn to write better!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I definitely loved this class and her way of teaching.
  • and looses track of what she is teaching us.
  • Definitely a great teacher if you're a beginner writer!

Theme 2

📄 About Assignments and Workload

  • A lot of the
  • She gives you a lot of
  • There is , but all of it will help you learn to write better!

Theme 3

⚖️ and Feedback

  • She also forgets to grade a lot of things
  • She doesn't offer a lot of constructive or .
  • She grades based on opinion and not academically.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are older and highly polarized.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1A2 reviews
ENGL1A2 reviews
ENG202321 review
ENGLISH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Rather not say 2