AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Amir Keshavarz

CHEM12 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless you can learn chemistry independently and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor online teachingSlow email responseTough gradingHeavy homeworkUnclear exams
  • Students consistently describe poor communication and rude or vague responses.
  • Exams and and slides.
  • The course has heavy work, no , and strict late-work handling.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Getting an A appears very hard because students report , and exams that do not match preparation materials.

All evidence comes from online reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The chemistry content feels difficult because lectures are heavy and assessments are described as poorly aligned with homework and slides.

Only online reviews describe the course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

One tag says skipping class means failing, and participation is mentioned, but comments .

The .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students overwhelmingly advise against taking him because of poor teaching, delayed communication, and harsh course policies.

All recommendation evidence is online, and every reviewed student .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Reviews mention tough grading, no , no late work, and .

Format shift

All grading evidence comes from online CHEM12 reviews.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Students repeatedly tagged lots of homework and lecture-heavy work, with quizzes and tests adding pressure.

Format shift

Only online reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students describe him as , and ineffective online.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Comments , and lectures, so grades appear based on mixed work rather than only exams.

Format shift

Assessment evidence is only from online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All reviews are online and , and exam alignment.

Main concern

Students report , and exams that do not match class materials.

What students said

“ .”
CHEM12
“ .”
CHEM12
“ and gives vague answers to yes or no questions.”
CHEM12

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe difficult or poorly aligned quizzes and tests, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Short quizzesTests poorly aligned with homeworkNo clear proctoring evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews mention five-question quizzes and ten-question tests but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Five-question quizzesTen-question testsPoor alignment with homework
“ homework.”
CHEM12
“5question quizzes-25 pts 10questi test 100pts”
CHEM12

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication; credibility rating: Medium.

Teaching Quality

15/100

“horrible online teacher.”

Recommendation Rate

5/100

“I .”

10/100

“No .”

Theme 1

Teaching Style

  • horrible online teacher.
  • very rude and informal.
  • .

Theme 2

Communication

  • He responds 12 hrs later via email.
  • , and is extremely rude when doing so.
  • and gives vague answers to yes or no questions.

Theme 3

Grades and Exams

  • homework.
  • No .
  • he doesn't allow late work

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Four recent online reviews are consistent and detailed, but the sample is small and limited to one course format.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CHEM124 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Rather not say 2