AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Rene O'Dell

SOC10 · SOC16 · SOC18 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
13/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you , and tolerate poor communication.

Best fit · Self Taught ProAvoidUnresponsiveOutdated MaterialConfusing Online SetupHard Exams
  • Every review gives Rene O'Dell the lowest quality rating and recommends avoiding the class.
  • Students repeatedly report poor , and unclear online assignments.
  • The course seems manageable in content at times, but disorganization and harsh.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

, but , and hard exams make earning an A unreliable.

Online reviews emphasize surprise assignments and poor grading feedback, while online.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The content is not always described as intellectually hard, but inaccessible materials and .

Online and or inaccessible materials.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Students felt they had to constantly check Canvas and keep up with hidden or .

Online evidence is stronger, while courses moved online.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students overwhelmingly say to avoid her because , and and exams.

Both online and recommendation evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

as unfair mainly because , and usable material for exams.

Format shift

Online reviews stress delayed grading, while material.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Assignments are sometimes described as easy, but students report , and excessive legwork.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the clearest workload complaints, while and tests.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Reviews consistently describe her as , and unsupportive when students need help.

Format shift

Both formats report serious teaching failures, especially communication breakdowns after online transition.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Students mention , and exams, with exams causing major frustration.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize assignments and Canvas tasks, while and PowerPoint material.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are also negative, especially after classes shifted online and .

Main concern

Students describe outdated PowerPoints, poor communication, and .

What students said

“Everything was PowerPoint heavy, and .”
SOC16
“Classmates and i were lost and trying to help each other and she still never replied to us on the discussion boards.”
SOC10

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, citing unreachable , and inaccessible materials.

Main concern

Students felt left alone with , and little instructor response.

What students said

“Once class went online she was no where to be reached.”
SOC10
“she never grades anything in a timely manner, so you never have a good idea of where you stand in the class.”
SOC18

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The because students say , but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules.

Hard ExamsMaterial MismatchPowerPoint-Based ExamsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as extremely hard and unlike the material, but do not clearly prove closed-book status or proctoring rules.

Hard ExamsPowerPoint HeavyMaterial Mismatch
“Everything was PowerPoint heavy, and .”
SOC16
“yet we were tested on that material.”
SOC10

Online

Online reviews say students were tested on inaccessible PowerPoint and video material, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Inaccessible Material TestedCanvas ConfusionExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“She did not modify her PowerPoints that included fill in the blanks and online and still tested on that info we did not know.”
SOC10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!!!!!!!!!!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in communication, organization, workload, and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation Level

5/100

“ !!!!!!!!!!!!!”

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“She was no where to be found. Avoid.”

📝

18/100

“Everything was PowerPoint heavy, and .”

Theme 1

📭 About Communication

  • Once class went online she was no where to be reached.
  • Rarely responds to emails, and .
  • she still never replied to us on the discussion boards.

Theme 2

🧩 About Organization

  • She .
  • She expects you to be on canvas 24/7 checking on surprise assignments or for 3 points.
  • Material is out dated.

Theme 3

📝 About Exams and Materials

  • Everything was PowerPoint heavy, and .
  • , yet we were tested on that material.
  • still tested on that info we did not know.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

There are only 5 reviews, but they are recent, detailed, unanimous in low ratings, and consistent across online and in-person formats.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

SOC103 reviews
SOC161 review
SOC181 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 4