AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Maher Yassine

MATH642 · MATH65A · MATH25 · MATH420 · MATH31 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want a clear and , but keep up with the pace and homework.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear lecturesPatient teacherFair gradingExtra credit availableAttendance flexible
  • Students consistently describe clear, patient teaching that makes math easier to understand.
  • and class effort, with or quiz edits helping some students.
  • The main risk is pace, especially in higher math where lectures can cover several lessons quickly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Students say doing homework and , but the A still requires steady work.

Online evidence shows light submitted homework, while and effort lead to high grades.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Math concepts can be hard, but and .

Online evidence says the concept is hard but manageable, while pacing.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

86/100

, though one tag suggests skipping may hurt performance.

In-person reviews clearly mention no roll, while the single online .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Students strongly recommend him because he explains clearly, cares about students passing, and .

Both formats are positive, with stronger recommendation confidence from the larger in-person sample.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

, and effort-based success make grading feel student-friendly.

Format shift

Online grading appears manageable, while and quiz flexibility.

Workload

Moderate

63/100

Homework and practice are expected, but students describe the workload as manageable when they keep up.

Format shift

Online work is described as limited submitted problems, while and test preparation.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Students repeatedly praise , and ability to make math understandable.

Format shift

Both formats support strong teaching, with in-person reviews giving broader and more detailed evidence.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and finals rather than relying on only one method.

Format shift

Online reviews mention chapter questions and lectures, while , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and fair grading while noting that some classes move fast.

Main concern

Fast-paced lectures can be challenging if students fall behind.

What students said

“ .”
MATH25
“his lectures are very fast paced.”
MATH420
“ .”
MATH31

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review says the class is manageable, structured, and .

Main concern

The concept is hard even though the class structure is manageable.

What students said

“Easy class but a hard concept.”
MATH65A
“He tries his best to make sure students know the material.”
MATH65A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes appear standard but student-friendly because , and ; reviews do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring rules.

Few ExamsGroup QuizzesQuiz EditsMidterm And Final

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

81/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, with group quizzes and quiz edits making the format more forgiving.

Group QuizzesOne ExamFinalQuiz EditsMidterm
“Group quizzes and .”
MATH31
“ and allows .”
MATH420
“There are a , and a final.”
MATH65A

Online

The online review mentions chapter questions but does not clearly .

Chapter Questions
“then we have two question at the end of every chapter.”
MATH65A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is the math class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“ and he wants all of his students to pass the class.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

91/100

“I would advise anyone who is going to take Math-65 or .”

📈 Grade Path

82/100

“if and the non mandatory work he gives you, and quizzes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and he wants all of his students to pass the class.
  • .
  • he makes lessons so much easier to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy class but a hard concept.
  • .
  • Put in the work and you will pass.

Theme 3

🧭 About Flexibility

  • .
  • and allows .
  • For each section

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews are detailed and consistent, but the sample is modest and includes only one online review.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH4202 reviews
MATH65A2 reviews
MATH251 review
MATH311 review
MATH6421 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 2