AI Rate Professor

Guidance

Noelle Riesgo

GUID507 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

if , and practical academic planning help.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHighly helpfulCaring counselorClear academic guidanceStudent-centered support
  • The only review is extremely positive and describes strong advising support.
  • The student felt heard, understood, and guided toward useful classes.
  • Evidence is limited because there is only one in-person review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

90/100

This is a guidance appointment rather than a graded course, so the effort-to-A risk appears minimal from the available review.

All evidence comes from one in-person-classified review, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

92/100

The review describes practical scheduling and academic planning help rather than difficult course content.

, and it is about counseling support.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

The review mentions making an appointment and having a virtual meeting, but it does not prove a .

There are no online reviews, and the single in-person-classified review only describes one appointment format.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

The student strongly recommends her because , and practical.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

No grading evidence is provided, but the guidance context and very .

Format shift

Only one in-person-classified counseling review exists, with no online evidence.

Workload

Featherlight

95/100

The review describes a single helpful advising appointment rather than ongoing coursework or assignments.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

The student describes her as , and focused on beneficial class choices.

Format shift

Only one in-person-classified review exists, and it is strongly positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

0/100

because the review is about counseling.

Format shift

Assessment evidence is absent in the only in-person-classified review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The in-person-classified review describes a virtual counseling meeting that , and practical.

Main concern

The evidence is very positive but based on only one review.

What students said

“she was AMAZING so helpful, and .”
GUID507
“if you need a counselor, go with her!”
GUID507

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do because the only review is about counseling, not a graded course.

No Exam Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

90/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The in-person-classified review does not .

No Exam Evidence

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she was AMAZING so helpful, and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Support Quality

96/100

“she was AMAZING so helpful, and .”

👍 Recommendation Level

96/100

“if you need a counselor, go with her!”

🧭 Academic Guidance

96/100

“made sure i was getting classes that would benefit me.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Support

  • she was AMAZING so helpful, and .
  • she was straight forward and made sure i was getting classes that would benefit me.

Theme 2

🧭 About Counseling

  • I needed help setting up my class schedule and my academic plan
  • if you need a counselor, go with her!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

, so the but the evidence base is limited.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

GUID5071 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values