AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Sandra Bermudez

NURADN14 · NUR14 · NURADN428 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
17/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself nursing material and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-teaching requiredConfusing examsUnclear lecturesHeavy readingPoor support
  • Most students say .
  • Students repeatedly report needing to teach themselves through books, Google, or YouTube.
  • One positive review praises her teaching, but the dominant experience is frustration and low recommendation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Grades are possible, but students , and tough grading rather than an easy path to an A.

Online reviews stress unclear materials and self-study, while and heavy work.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The nursing content , and exams that students say do not match instruction.

Both formats point to difficult learning conditions, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Reviews include skip-class warnings, but they do not clearly explain whether attendance is formally enforced or simply necessary to survive the course.

Online reviews include skip-class tags, while in-person comments focus more .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

because they feel unsupported and forced to teach themselves for .

Both online reviews are negative, and outlier.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

Students mention tough grading and or forgiving grading.

Format shift

The tough-grading tag appears in online evidence, while in-person evidence emphasizes .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Reviews describe heavy reading, , and self-teaching.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize reading and vague materials, while and long videos.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

One student praises her, but most reviews say lectures are unclear, unhelpful, or disconnected from exams.

Format shift

Online students consistently criticize clarity and support, while but mostly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews emphasize exams, tests, reading, and difficulty.

Format shift

In-person evidence explicitly mentions proctored and , while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative, citing pointless lectures, , and heavy work, with one strong positive outlier.

Main concern

Students report and lectures that do not prepare them well.

What students said

“Lectures are pointless (pure stories of experiences), just google and teach yourself the material.”
NUR14
“ and did not correlate with her lectures.”
NURADN428

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report unclear lectures, vague PowerPoints, poor help, and heavy reliance on the book or YouTube.

Main concern

Students say they must teach themselves because lectures and support are not reliable.

What students said

“ .”
NURADN428
“You .”
NURADN428

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students report proctored, confusing, test-heavy exams that do not match lectures well.

Proctored ExamsConfusing ExamsTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence includes a student report of proctored exams and , but does not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Proctored ExamsConfusing ExamsTest Heavy
“ .”
NURADN428
“ and did not correlate with her lectures.”
NURADN428

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, open-book rules, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Be ready to work, study and teach yourself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“ .”

👎 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ .”

🧪

20/100

“ and did not correlate with her lectures.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are pointless (pure stories of experiences), just google and teach yourself the material.
  • .
  • Her lectures are detailed and thorough.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Be ready to work, study and teach yourself.
  • You .
  • you have to look YouTube and book for most important mechanism.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • .
  • and did not correlate with her lectures.
  • Get ready to read

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 6 reviews are recent and mostly consistent, but the sample is small and includes one strong positive outlier.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

NURADN4283 reviews
NURADN142 reviews
NUR141 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

3

B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values