AI Rate Professor

Music

Thomas De Dobay

MUSIC2A · MUSIC30 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you are comfortable with inconsistent teaching quality and possible outside concert requirements.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerKind personBoring lecturesHard to hearConfusing testsCostly concerts
  • Reviews sharply conflict between personal praise and classroom complaints.
  • Negative , and .
  • One and reports.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Some students earned high grades and found parts easy, but and harsh report grades make the A less certain.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The material may not be advanced, but , and outside concert reports add difficulty.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Reviews , but one student had required outside concerts that consumed time and money.

All format evidence is in person, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation is uncertain because personal respect is offset by complaints about boring lectures, weak delivery, and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

One review reports getting C grades on costly concert reports, while grade evidence is otherwise too thin.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload is not consistently described, but required concerts added over 5 hours and significant cost.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Students praise him personally but criticize boring lectures, low audibility, and limited musical support.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and concert reports, suggesting a mix of exams and written work.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

review and two strong complaints about teaching, tests, and course value.

Main concern

Students report boring lectures, poor audibility, and .

What students said

“He was an amazing human being!!!”
MUSIC30
“Sang uninteresting songs and he could not play piano.”
MUSIC30
“ and had random information we never went over.”
MUSIC2A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The and included random information not covered in class.

Confusing TestsUncovered Test Material

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not prove proctoring, book policy, or .

Confusing TestsUncovered Test Material
“ and had random information we never went over.”
MUSIC2A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and had random information we never went over.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, assessment, and character. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Sat in front and couldn't hear a word he said, whispered a lot.”

⚖️ Assessment Fairness

35/100

“ and had random information we never went over.”

❤️ Personal Impression

50/100

“He was an amazing human being!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Sang uninteresting songs and he could not play piano.
  • Sat in front and couldn't hear a word he said, whispered a lot.

Theme 2

📝 About Tests & Reports

  • and had random information we never went over.
  • Then had to go to 2 concerts that cost me over 100 bucks to go to & 5+ hours of my time only to get a C on both reports.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He was an amazing human being!!!
  • And is sorely missed by those who loved him, and were fortunate to know him.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, and the comments conflict strongly.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MUSIC302 reviews
MUSIC2A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values